Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumAll Other Poker/Live Poker

I don't care what you know

Results 1 to 13 of 13

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default I don't care what you know

    Here is the whole hand. It doesn't matter if you know the beginning, middle or end. I think my biggest problem in limit is playing the ALMOST great hands. JJ, AKo, etc. Here's an example where I got lucky, but what can I do to increase my chances of winning / get my hand head-to-head.

    PokerStars Game #677847239: Hold'em Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2004/09/09 - 00:07:54 (ET)
    Table 'T #6657826' Seat #5 is the button
    Seat 1: Cuzz ($3.55 in chips)
    Seat 2: downtown32 ($14.25 in chips)
    Seat 4: Humphrind ($11.25 in chips)
    Seat 5: shapcam ($29 in chips)
    Seat 6: batman3939 ($1.75 in chips)
    Seat 7: FireStartaNZ ($13.10 in chips)
    Seat 8: Jedi Poker ($12.10 in chips)
    Seat 9: Shargaas ($15.35 in chips)
    Seat 10: Hayduke_mms ($5.85 in chips)
    batman3939: posts small blind $0.10
    FireStartaNZ: posts big blind $0.25
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to Humphrind [As Kh]
    Jedi Poker: folds
    Shargaas: folds
    Hayduke_mms: folds
    Cuzz: folds
    downtown32: calls $0.25
    Humphrind: raises $0.25 to $0.50
    shapcam: folds
    batman3939: calls $0.40
    FireStartaNZ: calls $0.25
    downtown32: calls $0.25
    *** FLOP *** [6d 9d Kc]
    batman3939: checks
    FireStartaNZ: checks
    downtown32: bets $0.25
    Humphrind: raises $0.25 to $0.50
    batman3939: folds
    FireStartaNZ: calls $0.50
    downtown32: calls $0.25
    *** TURN *** [6d 9d Kc] [9h]
    FireStartaNZ: checks
    downtown32: checks
    Humphrind: bets $0.50
    FireStartaNZ: calls $0.50
    downtown32: calls $0.50
    *** RIVER *** [6d 9d Kc 9h] [2h]
    FireStartaNZ: bets $0.50
    downtown32: folds
    Humphrind: calls $0.50
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    FireStartaNZ: shows [Td 7d] (a pair of Nines)
    Humphrind: shows [As Kh] (two pair, Kings and Nines)
    Humphrind collected $5.75 from pot
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot $6 | Rake $0.25
    Board [6d 9d Kc 9h 2h]
    Seat 1: Cuzz folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 2: downtown32 folded on the River
    Seat 4: Humphrind showed [As Kh] and won ($5.75) with two pair, Kings and Nines
    Seat 5: shapcam (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 6: batman3939 (small blind) folded on the Flop
    Seat 7: FireStartaNZ (big blind) showed [Td 7d] and lost with a pair of Nines
    Seat 8: Jedi Poker folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 9: Shargaas folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 10: Hayduke_mms folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    I don't know what they have to say
    It makes no difference anyway.
    Whatever it is...
    I'm against it.
  2. #2
    Here's another one.

    PokerStars Game #677865116: Hold'em Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2004/09/09 - 00:14:00 (ET)
    Table 'T #6657826' Seat #3 is the button
    Seat 1: Cuzz ($3.20 in chips)
    Seat 2: downtown32 ($11.25 in chips)
    Seat 3: sophietucker ($5.65 in chips)
    Seat 4: Humphrind ($14.50 in chips)
    Seat 5: shapcam ($25 in chips)
    Seat 6: batman3939 ($4.35 in chips)
    Seat 7: FireStartaNZ ($9.60 in chips)
    Seat 8: Jedi Poker ($13.35 in chips)
    Seat 9: SeaSide ($10 in chips)
    Seat 10: Hayduke_mms ($6.10 in chips)
    Humphrind: posts small blind $0.10
    shapcam: posts big blind $0.25
    SeaSide: posts big blind $0.25
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to Humphrind [Qh 5c]
    batman3939: calls $0.25
    FireStartaNZ: calls $0.25
    Jedi Poker: folds
    SeaSide: checks
    Hayduke_mms: folds
    Cuzz: calls $0.25
    downtown32: folds
    sophietucker: calls $0.25
    Humphrind: calls $0.15
    shapcam: checks
    *** FLOP *** [5s Qc Jc]
    Humphrind: bets $0.25
    shapcam: folds
    batman3939: folds
    FireStartaNZ: calls $0.25
    SeaSide: folds
    Cuzz: folds
    sophietucker: raises $0.25 to $0.50
    Humphrind: raises $0.25 to $0.75
    FireStartaNZ: folds
    sophietucker: calls $0.25
    *** TURN *** [5s Qc Jc] [5h]
    Humphrind: checks
    sophietucker: checks
    *** RIVER *** [5s Qc Jc 5h] [6d]
    Humphrind: bets $0.50
    sophietucker: calls $0.50
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    Humphrind: shows [Qh 5c] (a full house, Fives full of Queens)
    sophietucker: mucks hand
    Humphrind collected $4.50 from pot
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot $4.50 | Rake $0
    Board [5s Qc Jc 5h 6d]
    Seat 1: Cuzz folded on the Flop
    Seat 2: downtown32 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 3: sophietucker (button) mucked [Qs Ac] - two pair, Queens and Fives
    Seat 4: Humphrind (small blind) showed [Qh 5c] and won ($4.50) with a full house, Fives full of Queens
    Seat 5: shapcam (big blind) folded on the Flop
    Seat 6: batman3939 folded on the Flop
    Seat 7: FireStartaNZ folded on the Flop
    Seat 8: Jedi Poker folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 9: SeaSide folded on the Flop
    Seat 10: Hayduke_mms folded before Flop (didn't bet)

    Should I have bet the turn? I was assuming Firestarta had a draw and was wanting him out of the hand, hence the . But I guessed my check on the turn would induce a bet and give me a check-raising opportunity. I was wrong. I bet on the river to get something more in the pot.
    I don't know what they have to say
    It makes no difference anyway.
    Whatever it is...
    I'm against it.
  3. #3
    Last hand, for now.

    PokerStars Game #677877377: Hold'em Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2004/09/09 - 00:18:19 (ET)
    Table 'T #6657826' Seat #7 is the button
    Seat 1: Cuzz ($2.95 in chips)
    Seat 2: downtown32 ($9.75 in chips)
    Seat 3: sophietucker ($4.15 in chips)
    Seat 4: Humphrind ($17.50 in chips)
    Seat 6: batman3939 ($5.60 in chips)
    Seat 7: FireStartaNZ ($8.10 in chips)
    Seat 8: Jedi Poker ($15.85 in chips)
    Seat 9: SeaSide ($9.50 in chips)
    Seat 10: Hayduke_mms ($5.60 in chips)
    Jedi Poker: posts small blind $0.10
    SeaSide: posts big blind $0.25
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to Humphrind [9s 9c]
    Hayduke_mms: calls $0.25
    Cuzz: folds
    downtown32: folds
    sophietucker: raises $0.25 to $0.50
    Humphrind: raises $0.25 to $0.75
    batman3939: folds
    FireStartaNZ: folds
    Jedi Poker: folds
    SeaSide: folds
    SeaSide is sitting out
    Hayduke_mms: calls $0.50
    sophietucker: calls $0.25
    *** FLOP *** [7h Ts 8h]
    SeaSide leaves the table
    Hayduke_mms: checks
    sophietucker: checks
    Humphrind: bets $0.25
    Hayduke_mms: calls $0.25
    sophietucker: calls $0.25
    *** TURN *** [7h Ts 8h] [7s]
    Hayduke_mms: checks
    sophietucker: checks
    Humphrind: bets $0.50
    Hayduke_mms: calls $0.50
    sophietucker: calls $0.50
    *** RIVER *** [7h Ts 8h 7s] [4d]
    Hayduke_mms: checks
    sophietucker: checks
    Nashman4004 joins the table at seat #5
    Humphrind: bets $0.50
    Hayduke_mms: folds
    sophietucker: folds
    Humphrind collected $4.85 from pot
    Humphrind: doesn't show hand
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot $4.85 | Rake $0
    Board [7h Ts 8h 7s 4d]
    Seat 1: Cuzz folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 2: downtown32 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 3: sophietucker folded on the River
    Seat 4: Humphrind collected ($4.85)
    Seat 6: batman3939 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 7: FireStartaNZ (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 8: Jedi Poker (small blind) folded before Flop
    Seat 9: SeaSide (big blind) folded before Flop
    Seat 10: Hayduke_mms folded on the River


    Again with the pocket 9s. I missed everything and really considered checking the river. But I realized with a draw heavy board, and the river no help, I should bet. I bet, I won. Extreme luck or good strategy?
    I don't know what they have to say
    It makes no difference anyway.
    Whatever it is...
    I'm against it.
  4. #4
    Hand 1

    Perfect

    Hand 2
    Pre-flop: Fold unless it's suited. You'll pay off a dominating hand too often.
    Flop: Well done
    Turn: Must bet here. Only try to check raise if you don't 3-bet the flop or he caps. This isn't NL where you can make up missed rounds of betting
    River: Yup

    Hand 3
    Pre-flop: 3-bet is close. My minimum is TT unless I'm dealing with a maniac.
    Flop: Good
    Turn: Good
    River: Read dependent. Enough players call with an Ace here that this is probably a good bet. Check behind tricky/aggressive players.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    Hand 2
    Pre-flop: Fold unless it's suited. You'll pay off a dominating hand too often.
    I will defend my pre-flop until the day I die. I only completed the small blind. In NL as well as limit, I'll do this.

    But you said I should only check the turn if I don't 3-bet the flop. WOuld it have been a good move to call a raise on the flop? with 2 pair? I obviously wasn't that confident in turning a full house. But in hindsight, calling would have given me check-raise ability on the turn. I will remember that. Feining weakness is a lot easier in NL.
    I don't know what they have to say
    It makes no difference anyway.
    Whatever it is...
    I'm against it.
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Humphrind
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    Hand 2
    Pre-flop: Fold unless it's suited. You'll pay off a dominating hand too often.
    I will defend my pre-flop until the day I die. I only completed the small blind. In NL as well as limit, I'll do this.
    In limit it's a leak. Particularly starting out, you'll pay off too much with it. Fold A5o here too.
  7. #7
    Hump, when I just starting to play serious limit about 6 months ago you would had me on board with your preflop small blind completion. But now after studying and playing it is a leak that costs you bundles long term in limit. Tell me how you win more than you lose with that hand in particlular? You have to get lucky to have top pair with horrible kicker or two pair. A five isnt going to win you anything unless it trips somehow, it s unsuited so no flush possible. Do you fold this hand if the BB raises?
    I just want to know why you thinks its a smart thing to do?
    Holy crap I cant play against Yoda!!
  8. #8
    I agree with the poster above and the poster above him . . .

    I'll refer you to what TJ said to a late limper with regard to completeing the SB "Why don't you fold that trash".
    Poker is all about the long long long long long long long term . . .
    Barney's back . . . back again . . .
  9. #9
    michael1123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    1,328
    Location
    Rochester Hills, MI
    I agree to Toasty agreeing with the two posters above his post. Suited, at least you have some more options. In NL, it can work, especially if you're willing to play it aggressively (if you flop a pair of 5s with one over for example ... although your position still blows). In limit, you're setting yourself up to have to call down with a pair of Qs and a horrid kicker or a lowly pair of 5s, or you're going to fold on the flop or turn 99% of the time, wasting the difference between the BB and SB and possibly also wasting a call on the flop (if you hit one of your cards on the flop, call, and fold to a blank turn).

    Plus the SB is 10 cents and the BB is 25. You should be more willing to fold SB hands here than if the SB were half the size of the BB. On the other hand, when the SB is 2/3rds of the BB, I think you can be pretty damn loose on completing the SB, only folding the truly horrid hands. But still ... Q6o is pretty horrid. 76o may even be a better hand to complete with if there's a lot of limpers, being connected and very unlikely to be dominated.
  10. #10
    Also keep in mind that you will be first to act for the rest of the hand.

    One simple rule I follow for SB play is if I wouldn't call with it on the button I won't complete, unless, it's suited and I'm getting good odds.
    Poker is all about the long long long long long long long term . . .
    Barney's back . . . back again . . .
  11. #11
    OK, you got me. I accept that the limit players all say it's a bad move to complete the SB with bad / marginal hands, so it's a bad move. I will still do this in NL, but you have talked me out of doing this in limit.

    I played in this ring game for about 2 hours, and I ended last night's limit session + 40BB. I'm sure a little luck was involved, but I also had some help. Thanks for the help.
    I don't know what they have to say
    It makes no difference anyway.
    Whatever it is...
    I'm against it.
  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    Quote Originally Posted by Humphrind
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    Hand 2
    Pre-flop: Fold unless it's suited. You'll pay off a dominating hand too often.
    I will defend my pre-flop until the day I die. I only completed the small blind. In NL as well as limit, I'll do this.
    In limit it's a leak. Particularly starting out, you'll pay off too much with it. Fold A5o here too.
    I should have guessed this in limit, as implied odds basically go out the door, but have never consciously repeated this to myself. thanks.

    with that in mind, i'd basically have to agree with Fnord, though I can't say I'd have played it differently than you.
    If I had a hammer
    I'd drop in the morning
    I'd drop in the evening..
  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Humphrind
    OK, you got me. I accept that the limit players all say it's a bad move to complete the SB with bad / marginal hands, so it's a bad move. I will still do this in NL, but you have talked me out of doing this in limit.

    I played in this ring game for about 2 hours, and I ended last night's limit session + 40BB. I'm sure a little luck was involved, but I also had some help. Thanks for the help.
    I find it very helpful to think of defending my small blind this way:

    If I will not call multiple limpers on the button with a hand, then I will not complete my small blind with it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •