33 @ 10NL FR

You're not getting called by worse unless they are really bad. blockbet/folding isn't an option cos you'll get the odds to call when they shove. Check/calling like $4 is a bit icky because for that to be profitable you have to either be able to fold blank rivers, or he has to have the worse hand some of the time. Definitely check tho.

Originally Posted by oskar

You're not getting called by worse unless they are really bad. blockbet/folding isn't an option cos you'll get the odds to call when they shove. Check/calling like $4 is a bit icky because for that to be profitable you have to either be able to fold blank rivers, or he has to have the worse hand some of the time. Definitely check tho.

Well, doesn't UTG only have like 2-3 Combos of Nut flush draws? AJcc,AQcc,AKcc, and maybe KQcc.

Isn't it one of those situations that if he has nut flush he bet 100% of the time here since it is against 2 opponents and one seems to really like his hand. So him not betting weights his range towards weaker holdings. I mean only really horrible people would not shove their NF here and if he is THAT bad he might show up with some weaker JcJx here?

For the guy behind he has more flush draws but its pretty bad to call the flop bet.


It just comes down to if the guy ahead ever checks his flush here and if the guy behind ever calls with QcQx,JcJc. And maybe 22?

Originally Posted by !Luck

Well, doesn't UTG only have like 2-3 Combos of Nut flush draws? AJcc,AQcc,AKcc, and maybe KQcc.

how do we know this with zero fucking reads? and if we assume they're both regs then it doesn't much matter what utg has anyway - if we bet and get called we lose
would you be happy getting it in with 4c5c on this turn?