Well, take a look at the math of the situation. fwiw, I pretty much agree with your range for villain there.
I'll use a recent hand of mine for the actual numbers.
I don't have many hands with this villain, but so far he seems like a straightforward tagg. I have no reason to think he's getting out of line here.
$0.25/$0.5 No Limit Holdem
6 players
Converted at weaktight.com
Stacks:
UTG ($52.30)
UTG+1 ($27.65)
CO ($73.80)
BTN ($78.55)
SB ($56.00)
Hero ($51.75)
Pre-flop: ($0.75, 6 players) Hero is BB

2 folds, CO calls $0.50, 1 fold, SB raises to $3, Hero raises to $10, CO folds, SB raises to $56, Hero calls $41.75
After villain pushes I need to call another $41.75 with $62.25 in the pot already. (He had me covered, he really only has $51.75 in the pot there)
This puts the pot odds at 1.49:1.
Then pokerstove QQ vs his range:
This works out to a hair over 1.5:1 against you. That's pretty damn close to an 0 ev for folding and calling. If you think QQ is part of his range to, it's also just about a 0ev decision either way, but this time you are very slightly getting the better side it.Code:equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 39.857% 39.64% 00.22% 114030168 626394.00 { QQ } Hand 1: 60.143% 59.92% 00.22% 172384116 626394.00 { KK+, AKs, AKo }
The reason I call is the added chance that he could be bluffing. I don't think it's very likely, but if this is ever a bluff, or if you have a read to put villain on a wider range, I think this turns into an easy call.
Notice this is 100bb deep. Deeper and you won't be getting odds to call, shorter and its an easy call.
 
					


 
					
					

 
					
					
					
						 Reply With Quote
 Reply With Quote