I never said to fold the flop. I call flop because he could very likely have learned to cbet when he misses. However, the turn is not inherently a good 2barrel card (aka not a scare card), so I don't expect him to 2 barrel bluff often, if at all without further reads. So no.. Don't fold the flop because you are likely still ahead of his range, but on the turn you probably aren't ahead of the range he bets for value and because he is so nitty that he doesn't bluff often, then calling when you have very little equity against his value range and him having such a low bluffing frequency is quite foolish.

Also I don't agree with your ranges. While he could very likely have JJ+, AQ, I don't think he is cbetting 100% of that range. Why would he cbet JJ/KK here? If he bet KK here, are you ever calling with a worse hand? I highly doubt it.

Also, why do you want control of this pot. As much as aggressive play is likely better than passive play in a lot of spots, aggression is not always correct. What would a turn lead accomplish? What would be your objective? Are you leading the turn with the belief that he will call with worse hands? Are you leading the turn with the belief that he will fold often enought o be profitable? Because imo the second option (he folds often enough) is the only likely candidate. Name one hand he cbets the flop with, and calls a turn lead with that we beat in his range (other than AJ and I believe he doesn't have AJ in his range 100% of the time nor does he call AJ 100% of the time on the turn).

Also with your second range example you are either (A) being highly optimistic with his calling range or (B) made a mistake. As soon as the turn rolls off, practically nothing about the hand has changed. Before I act I still believe I'm ahead of his range for raising preflop and cbetting the flop. However, because I feel I'm ahead of that range, it does not automatically warrant a bet. Why? Because when I bet I am no longer dealing with his entire range. My bet will manipulate his range in such a way he now has subranges. A range of hands he will fold, a range he will call, a range he might raise either for value or as a bluff. So I can't just look at his entire range and how I fair against his entire range when I decide to make a bet or not on the turn. I need to focus on his calling range. And against his calling range, I do not feel we are ahead (>50% equity). It is because of this that I don't believe we can bet the turn for value, since when we are called we are likely behind more often than not.

I see in your range analysis you have JJ and KK still in his range. While "if" he cbet this flop with those hands, it is in his turn range at the start. But when we bet is he going to call with those hands? I highly doubt it. So we no longer have 60% equity against the range of hands he calls our turn lead with. We have more like 25%. Which is less than the needed 50% to bet for value.