Maybe so, but that's a point for disagreement. My point is that Spenda spammed the same post in all three threads an locked them, with vague instructions. If you want to exploit based on ranges, equity and manipulation, we need some scenarios.

"How do you exploit passive PF play" is a wide topic. What 'better answers' are we looking for? Are we supposed to make up our own ranges? Pull scenarious out of our ass? I'm sorry, but that doesn't work becuase we'll end up with 15 different scenarios and the thread ends up as nothing but a bunch of tangents.

I'm not being harsh. I'm not upset with Spenda. But I'm the child of two teachers, and I'm married to a teacher. I've also been responsible for technical training in my field, so I know a little bit about the craft. If the goal is to instruct, you need defined parameters.