Quote Originally Posted by B-squared View Post
A second bluffing scenario. I am looking at whether my bluff on the river was profitable:

Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.02 BB (5 handed) - Full Tilt Converter Tool from http://www.flopturnriver.com

SB is very loose and passive. A 0.02c raise was his go-to bet when he was bluffing (badly).

UTG ($2.78)
MP ($1.03)
Button ($1.33)
SB ($0.91)
Hero (BB) ($1.91)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 4, A
3 folds, SB calls $0.01, Hero checks

Flop: ($0.04) Q, K, 3 (2 players)
SB bets $0.02, Hero calls $0.02

Turn: ($0.08) 2 (2 players)
SB bets $0.02, Hero raises to $0.08, SB calls $0.06

River: ($0.24) 7 (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $0.18, 1 fold

Total pot: $0.24 | Rake: $0.01

Results below:
Spoiler:

Hero didn't show 4, A (high card, Ace).
Outcome: Hero won $0.23

Which better hands are you getting to fold here? I want you to think about the merits of checking instead of bluffing on the river.