|
[quote="Fnord"]
 Originally Posted by fishstick
after thinking about it, i would add Qxs as well, with the caveat that on the A K Q x suited hands, i'm really looking for a larger cards (e.g. Q9s) to go with the over.
 Originally Posted by Fnord
Looks good. Only adjustment is that in NL I' m more concerned about price than number of limpers, as I don't need as many players to pay-off my implied odds. In general, stay away from the offsuit junk. Although, offsuit connectors might be profitable in a NL game.
Anyone got PT data to back any of this up?
i checked PT, and keeping in mind that most of my data is tourney data, from the small blind, there was not much difference in performance between suited and non-suited no-gap connectors. i specifically looked KQ, QJ, JT, T9, 98, and 87.
this surprised me.
|