I've been thinking about this thread for a while after watching some videos from GS and doing some personal study, I think what Spenda is looking for is checking to induce a bet.

Here's an example of a hand that I was just involved in that hopefully illustrates the point:

Villain has been running an impressive 92/67 over 66 hands.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.05 BB (8 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

Hero (MP2) ($5.86)
CO ($4.13)
Button ($1.88)
SB ($7.22)
BB ($28.62)
UTG ($8.60)
UTG+1 ($9.88)
MP1 ($9.74)

Preflop: Hero is MP2 with 3, A
3 folds, Hero raises to $0.20, 3 folds, BB calls $0.15

Flop: ($0.42) Q, Q, A (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $0.30, BB calls $0.30

Turn: ($1.02) 10 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks

River: ($1.02) 8 (2 players)
BB bets $1.70, Hero calls $1.70

Total pot: $4.42 | Rake: $0.20

The key here is checking behind on the turn. The reason for checking behind is to keep his range wide on the river because I don't want to be playing against the top of his range. By checking behind on the turn, I manipulate his range in such a way that my hand plays well against it, and at the same time allow him to bluff a lot of missed rivers.

Against a standard opponent I wouldn't take this line but b/c this player was so incredibly loose, I knew that a. my weak ace still fared well against his range and b. he would bet a lot of rivers with worse hands b/c he sensed weakness on the turn.

As an aside, this player ran 97/67 or so over 150 hands, was up 8 BIs at one point, and then went broke. Fun to watch though.