Oh yeah, sorry I forgot to include any reads/stats I had on him.
Well, I had no notes on him and I figured from his stats 65/9/35 he played a tight range, but was fairly aggressive. I only had 50 hands on him though, so I doubt it's a totally accurate description...since his VPIP was 65%, I guess he was hitting some good cards (please confirm if this is the right way of analysing stats).
As for his range, after he checked the flop I put him on 22-55, 77, 88, 56+, Ax, Qx, Kx, but seemingly no *made* hands (by this I mean, nothing bankable). However, I was probably wrong in thinking like this because his stats indicated a really tight range, so I should have factored him having a set. (even though I wasn't *actually* wrong with Qx).
Since I had TPTK, I bet highly (to take away his implied odds?), and he re-raised me high I figured maybe I had his range. His stats indicated (as I later checked) that he check-raises a lot, so maybe I should have acted differently.
Reply With Quote