How Important is Table Selection at 100NL?

I am wondering how important 100NL regs who post here feel that table selection is. I usually just hop onto whatever tables are available, but my BB/100 is slightly less than 3 at FullTilt, after over 14k hands.

Granted it isn't a large sample size but i am wondering if anyone takes time to research opponents before they sit down at this limit.

Knowing when to leave or change seats is more important.

Very important. You can datamine at FT, so there's no excuse to sit down at bad tables or in bad seats. And good tables and seats can turn bad quickly, so you have to have the discipline to leave when they do.

debateable.

I would still always sit at a table of small and half stacks who you know are going to be bad at these stakes. Saying that, if you sit at a table fo full buy ins, you arent going to be playing against anything/anyone that wont pay a set or fold to aggression when they missed so its hardly sharky.

Saying that, Fnord has a point that when you are playing in games where sooo many shorty's will sit and bid for a shot at a glory, sitting with two of em behind you calling every preflop raise in position is definitly not a game you want to play in.

Its still good practice to select tables at 100nl but not as important as it becomes at 200nl+. You could sit at any 100nl table and probably still pwn