|
 Originally Posted by storm75m
i agree on the shorthanded forum, playing a 6 max game is so totally different from playing in a full ring... the action is fast and furious and your post flop play has to be much better, your starting hand requirements loosen, you can bluff more, etc. etc. I was strictly playing 6 max for a while, consistently winning... then switched to full tables and lost 1/3 of my BR. It is definitely a whole different animal. There is even this " maniac" style that is pretty profitable that is starting to catch on a lot, and people are running over the 6 max tables like madmen. I would definetly be interested in learning more...
Definitely. I was crushing 6-max games with around a 50% VPIP, but when I started playing ring games again I was getting killed trying to run over the table like I did at 6-max. Since then, I've reverted to my old tight aggressive ring game strategy, and now I'm consistently winning again when I play full tables. Shorthanded games are all about aggression and outplaying postflop, whereas ring games are more about camping for big hands
|