My definition of a mouse is a player who is
passive and who likes to minibet and miniraise. A mouse may or may not be a
loose caller but he/she should be quite readable.
Yesterday I sat at a NL25 table and saw some player min. bet all 3 streets with a
set.
Another hand, a player in BB flopped
quads with 33 on a board of 33AQJ, the
action went checked through on
flop,
check-called a min bet from
UTG who had AK and was a mouse himself, and then checked through again on the
river again.
Because of their predictability mice are easily for us to avoid losing huge pots to, unlike a
LAG and the associated variances that we might have
deal with.
The question is, where do we
rank the mice between the stations and the wild donks?