10-31-2004 05:55 PM
#1
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
10-31-2004 08:19 PM
#2
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Buyin with max. If I hit a hand, I want a chance to win the max amount of money. It's also easy for the larger stacks to push you off hands when you buyin short. |
| |
10-31-2004 08:31 PM
#3
| |
| |
| |
10-31-2004 09:56 PM
#4
| |
| |
10-31-2004 10:01 PM
#5
| |
It's easier to call a big bet on the river when you have a realitivly small stack. i.e. You've got bottom two pair on a flush and straight board and a big stack lays down a 50 dollar bet but you've only got 6 left and the pot is about 45 bucks, its alot easier to call than if you have 56 dollars left and faced with an allin. | |
| |
10-31-2004 10:15 PM
#6
| |
![]() ![]()
|
i always buy in with the max, and make sure i have the max in my stack or at least have everyone at the table covered. is that a bad thing? i mean, if i sit down and post say $2 for the big blind and i lose that hand, i put the 2 dollars right back in my stack before the next hand. I just feel more comfortable like that I guess. |
10-31-2004 10:42 PM
#7
| |
I totally agree with Fnord and Melinda, if I have the nuts or just the best hand I want to win the most. If your playing solid poker you shouldn't be worrying about your stack or anyone elses. Those of you who believe you should buyin with less are playing scared and are better off at a lesser buyin and buyin fully. I also want the most money at the table so I would never take money off and come back in. As you guys have said you guys are sometimes intimadated by the big stack, so I want to be that persin. Just my 2 cents | |
| |
11-01-2004 10:47 AM
#8
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
| |
11-01-2004 11:08 AM
#9
| |
| |
11-01-2004 12:05 PM
#10
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
| |
11-01-2004 03:20 PM
#11
| |
| |
11-01-2004 03:51 PM
#12
| |