|
|
Caddie,
You're absolutely right I didn't consider his range, maybe you'll be able to point me in the right direction because although I understand putting people on ranges is paramount to being successful in the long run I have had some trouble getting the concept started in my head.
More specifically I am not sure where to start even thinking about what someone's range might be. My question now (although I'm severely off-topic) is can we make some general assumptions about the ranges of players at 2NL?
Supposing they are a player that tends to limp in a bunch of hands with the rest of everyone can we make the assumption that they are going to have some sort of hand that at least makes sense, i.e. pocket pairs, connectors, some sort of paint, broadways, etc.? But a PF raise will probably indicate some sort of better hand, bigger PP's, large suited connectors, suited broadways, and so forth (assuming they aren't overly aggressive on every hand)?
I am under the impression that ranges are a very player specific item, but I feel like there should be some sort of larger range set you can assume as the general case before you pick a subset for that particular player after seeing them play at least a couple orbits.
I hope that makes sense, I'm just trying to figure out where to start on this.
Thanks for your patience,
L
|