|
Hello folks
Here is my two cents worth. NL and LIM are both complex, but the big thing I find is that the key decsions (or many of them ) take place at different points in the game. Also, there are more decisions over time in LIM than NL
I should add that I like LIM at 6H tables (hate it at 10), and like NL at 10H tables (hate it a 6H).
Playing LIM at at a 10H table seems a bit of a paradox for me. I wait for a good entry point and when I do have the hand I only have a pea-shooter to play with. If I am at a 10 person table, I want some ammo to both protect and/or capitalize on my hand.
Anyway, back to the differences.
In LIM I can live with a few (not many) bad or intuitive pre-flops decisions, because the key decision points come post-flop. If I make lots of bad decsions post-flop I will lose money.
In NL I find (especially in tourneys), the post-flop decisions more clear cut, and the pre-flop desicions way more crucial, as you can become full or partialy committed. (I know I am generalzing).
In LIM the better players gets the advantage, for several reasons.
1. He will be in more hands
2. He will have the opportunity to bet, raise, re-reasie, ck-raise, fold more often
3. he will see more cards (thus have more info) to add to his higher level of skill
4. He will not suffer fatal blows, thus he can vary his level of aggressiveness
In NL the better player will beat the weaker player more times than most. But the fact is the set-up of the game makes him more prone to going down or out quickly, and he can't use his skills if he just lost all his chips when your AQs took down his KK..
I realize that these are just opinions, but I think the very skilled players would be wise to take advantages of LIM. I have seen on threads that some of great players like NL the best, but make their big money by playing LIM over longer periods of time.
Let's look at a golf anaology to put things into perspective.
I'm playing TigerWoods for a a million $ (I know, bear with me).
We are agreeing on the rules for the tournanemt. He wants to play 18 holes. Me? Of course, I just want to play one hole.
I'm in deep trouble here. I'm outskilled by miles, so to maximize my chance of winning I need a couple of things to happen.
1. I need Tiger to have ONE beat beat (not a bunch of little ones)
2. I need to ensure that he can't recover from the bad beat
3. I need to play my best, and get lucky, because I know I can't sustain good play over time
So it's a no-brainer - I want to play one hole, hope he hits his drive in the lake or in the trees, and I hope I can win the hole.
What does Tiger want?
1. More chances to use his skill, to help minimize a bad beat
2. More chances for me to play bad
3. His hot new wife (lol)
In NL the World Champion can be all-in pre-flop holding KK and a chimp can be all-in holding AJs. From this point on talent does not matter. Neither does experience, pot odds, tells, implied odds, etc.
Same situation in LIM and all the factors above are still in play. The World Champ can still use all his talent, and win in a number of ways (or cut his losses and fold).
The Chimp knows that his chances of success go down with every new decision point (and even if he doesn't know this, U can bet the World Champ does).
I'm not saying one game is harder or easier, but I do beleive that a very talented player has more chances to shine (with less fatal risk) in LIM verus NL.
|