I would love to find an up-to-date, coherent, convincing argument about why, for example, Bodog should be fishier than Ulitmatebet, or Paradise than Prima, or whatever.

I understand the Party/(former) skins issue, and I also understand that Party is the biggest in terms of membership and advertising and should, therefore, also have the most fish.

But I'm not sure, for example, why Pokerroom is never quoted as a haven for amateurs but Pacific (for example) is. My own experience of both sites is that the standard is much of a muchness, and my hardwired logic tells me this should be the case overall, where specific examples (such as the Party situation) can be put in their correct context.

Basically I want someone to convince me that the majority of poker sites don't just tend to the average in terms of player skill. Then, I want someone to tell me where I should play $50NL with rakeback and a flapping pool of trapped fishies