OK, I don't have a ton of hands on anybody. I'll post what I can, then try to go through other examples higher up the page and comment.

1st Villain is 30/24 with 20% 3bet (24/119 opportunities) and 30% attempt to steal.
1. LP vs. EP: AQ and 5bet shove after opp 4bet
2. LP vs. LP: A8 check flop, bet t/r TTxxx
3. SB vs. LP: 66 and 5bet shove after opp 4bet
4. BB squeeze vs. LP's: ATs, ai on flush draw flop
5. LP vs. LP: AQ checked behind on 676 flop

Blinds vs. LP : 66, ATs

Interesting that he's 3betting 66+. Using inference, let's guess this range (about 18% - I'm assuming he "tightens up" a bit oop):

66+
A2s+, A8+
K9s+, KJ+
QTs, QJ+
JTs

LP vs. LP : AQ, A8

We have to assume this is his widest 3betting range, so I'm trying fit in a bit more than 20% here:

66+
A2+
KQ, K9s+
T8s+, 76s+

This is still only 23%, despite the horrible prospect of having to play K9s, QTs or A2-A6 offsuit in a 3bet pot. Raisy Daisy.

LP vs. EP : AQ

This doesn't give much information, except that he seems delightfully unaware he's folding out all the hands he can beat.

Recap

This guy 3bets really small, about 2.67xPFR oop, 2.33xPFR ip. His squeeze was just his normal sized 3bet. I suppose that, if you're going to 3bet this wide a range, it's better to keep the price affordable. He's somewhat positionally aware, but he is 3betting an incredibly wide range from pretty much all positions. Unfortunately, he also appears to 4bet/5bet light, too. So he's not easily exploitable with aggression.

However, if we pick up AA/KK against him, we should bet hard preflop!