|
|
 Originally Posted by DJAbacus
I don't want an advanced Maths lesson.
The only reason this turned into a math lesson is because you have not believed a word I've said. Fine. You don't know me or my credentials. We disagree. Now. I can only convince you that my method is proven and based on sound logic with the math. So you've tied my hands here.
As for your analogy: I bet you'd pay more attention to the drops if each one could potentially cause money to appear or disappear in your wallet.
You started the conversation with this:
Originally Posted by DJAbacus
and now you're telling me this:
Originally Posted by DJAbacus
I appreciate that you have a better understanding of variance but I feel I have enough of an understanding of variance in poker, not to get wet.
You have spent days in a conversation with an expert in the field (me) - who has disagreed with everything you've said on the subject and tried to set you straight. You have refused to change your opinion and you still "feel" like you understand variance?
 Why? SMH
[pretentious]
It's like you're just standing there with your eyes closed and you swear you know what you're looking at.
[/pretentious]
"To stand under and understand is all the same"
-Shakespeare - Two Gentlemen of Verona
You have this thing built up in your head, but if you don't humble yourself to the concept, you will never get it.
|
Reply With Quote