Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

Size of monitor?

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1

    Default Size of monitor?

    Hi All,

    A newbie here, have drifted at poker for a couple years, want to give my poker a proper go instead winning some losing some etc etc....

    Read loads on this site so thank you all.

    At the moment have a laptop, I want to start multi tabling, what size monitor would i need to have 4 tables, on party on screen at one time.

    Thanks in advance,

    Crafty
  2. #2
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...
    I believe it's resizable so 1280x1024 would be sufficient.

    Generally you need 1600x1200 for no overlap
  3. #3
    Thanks dude,
  4. #4
    Gross Guest

    Default re: monitor for poker

    Hi acrafty, I think 17" monitor with minimum 1024 x 768 screen resolution will be fine for you. Though I want to tell you some thing; If you are new to online gambling {solicitation URL removed by Xianti} then its better to play it in your desktop, because desktop computer will give you more comfort and it is much faster then laptop. It's just a suggestion I hope you won't mind for that.
  5. #5
    Halv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,196
    Location
    No hindsight for the blind.

    Default Re: re: monitor for poker

    Quote Originally Posted by Gross
    desktop computer will give you more comfort
    Not necessarily. I spent the entire summer laying in my bed 4-tabling on a 12" laptop balanced on my chest, and it was anything but uncomfortable.

    That said, as we speak there is a 20" 1600*1200 LCD on its way to accompagny (sp?) the 19" 1280*1024 LCD that is standing on my desk.

    Edit; and WELCOME TO FTR to the both of you!
  6. #6
    Thanks for the advice, I think that I am going to get a 19" widescreen from acer. I think that I can pick it up for about £130 which is not bad value.
  7. #7
    widescreens are weird. 1600x1200 is the shit, 4-tabling with no overlap. (i have two samsung 204b's, they're awesome)
    >3

    this is my favourite part of the post
    it looks like angry boobs
  8. #8
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    if you play at a site with resizeable tables, a 19" is fine IMO. im not sure about widescreens though
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by sandstorm
    widescreens are weird. 1600x1200 is the shit, 4-tabling with no overlap. (i have two samsung 204b's, they're awesome)
    204b's are the way to go. Ive got 2. They are coming down in price too.

    Widescreens may look cool but they arent practical for poker.
    Oldest TerryBlog (the good ole days): http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...oker-40661.htm

    Older TerryBlog (failed attempt #1):
    http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...887&highlight=
  10. #10
    I'm using an old Dell 21" beasty. It does 1600x1200 and can just about display four tables (depending on the site) without overlapping.

    But, it's huge, takes two people to lift and takes up most of my desk. I would seriously sell it and then buy two flat screens. not only would I get more desk space, but also more desktop area. hell, 2 x 17s would be enough (2 x 1280x1024)

    ***************************************
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/jameseyb
    http://gunsonfilm.blogspot.com/
    ***************************************
  11. #11
    Sorry to hijack.

    Sandstorm, where did you get your 204b? I mean they seem to retail stateside for around $350 which I'm thinking "ooh, hmm... maybe" and then it's $550 from anywhere in Sweden.
    Blah blah Op Blah blah

    Faith in Jesus Christ is +EV. That is all.
  12. #12
    i picked my 204b up from circuit city for around $350 i believe.
  13. #13
    theDEEPdish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    332
    Location
    in a van by the river
    does it only depend on the monitor your using for what your maximum resolution can be or does your computer have limitations, I want to get 1600 x 1200 but am pretty clueless
  14. #14
    I have a Dell 2007FP and am very satisfied with it. It looks great - both the screen and the actual monitor. I ordered my 2nd one a few days ago. Also i hear the Samsung 204b is a great monitor as well.
  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by theDEEPdish
    does it only depend on the monitor your using for what your maximum resolution can be or does your computer have limitations, I want to get 1600 x 1200 but am pretty clueless
    It's really just the monitor, I believe. It's possible that really old hardware wouldn't support it, but I doubt it.

    At most you'd need a new video card. A $50 one would be quite sufficient.
  16. #16
    Oh! I had never thought about the aspect of monitor before! Since I got to see the world of this virtual casino I became so addicted that I was determined to make all the arrangements with the help of which I could play the game at the comfort of my home. So far I was a silent spectator of the games being played by my friend at his place. Anyways thanks to this place where the importance of the size of the monitor was emphasized else I couldnt have learned the same!
  17. #17
    this should be good enough

    Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •