|
|
 Originally Posted by XTR1000
Originally Posted by iopq
Originally Posted by XTR1000
Nothing changes, but ranges.
I would say general strategies change. Full ring has a lot of limp-and-hit-big fish while 6m has a lot of I- bluff-you fish.
So limp-calling ranges get wider in FR while bet-when-checked-to ranges widen in 6m u say?
It's not ranges, it's frequencies.
For example, you'll get bluff raised on the flop more often in 6m. It doesn't matter what the villain holds, so he doesn't have a "bluff raising range" other than "all hands that have little value" which admittedly becomes wider. But it's the fact that villain 3bs 14% on the button in 6m while in FR it's like 5%.
Remember that in poker the best strategy is often bluffing the correct percentage of the time, not "with the correct hands"
you're not going to get suited aces every hand, so when it's a good time, 3b bluff hands that may not be at the top of your bluffing range
you can't say "well in FR almost nobody 3b bluffs with Axo, but in 6m the 3b bluffing range is wider so it's Axo and suited gappers as well as Axs"
it's more like "when people get Axo OTB in FR they choose to 3b bluff with them 10%, but in 6m they choose to bluff with them 30% of the time"
tl;dr version: it's the bluffing frequency not the range with which people bluff
|
Reply With Quote