|
|
 Originally Posted by JustinSKS
No one seems to be able to answer how we decide which factors are more important or how we decide what pieces of information are of more value than one another. Also how are we even able to decipher the information we are being fed that we turn it into reads about their playing abilities. It seems like we need large samples to start developing really solid reads from what I've read. Well then what becomes note worthy as you work towards developing these reads? I mean shouldn't we just 1-table and just note everything these players do? Seems like it would be very tedious and reading player notes would be similar to reading a page of a book after a few hundred hands; n with online timers well you got like 30secs. So that really begs the question still of how do we decipher through our information to figure what is the most important factors that should affect our decision making. Even for like minor decisions. I don't think people should just slack on so called ez choices. Every choice should have sound logical reasoning.
Tacit knowledge - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sometimes it really is just impossible to put into words or describe logically how we come up with a decision. We all use these factors to come up with one, but which ones we deem important really depends on the current situation and dynamics, imo. It makes it even harder to do on such a complicated game like poker where there are several variables to consider.
|
Reply With Quote