|
 Originally Posted by Ghandii
In my experience yes I do. Also a lot of the players I play with in live tourneys agree. That is where I heard about pokerstars and why I stopped playing paddypower.
I could be way wrong of course, but thats just how I saw it.
I'm afraid you are wrong - see the explanation above.
It is a natural human reaction to try and explain unexpected or unlikely events. It is a natural human reaction to try and blame someone else when things go wrong. These two things come together when live poker players, disconcerted by the speed and unfamiliar feel of online games, find themselves suffering more bad beats IN A SET TIME FRAME than they are used to.
I hope you're the kind of person who takes Sprayed's explanation above as common sense and adjusts his own view accordingly - I know from bitter experience that some people just can't be convinced of the honesty of the online poker deal. Let me explain why this is to their immense disadvantage:
If we make a mistake playing poker and lose money it sucks. But we can deal with it because we can identify the mistake and use it to help us become a better player. Hopefully next time we won't make it. Similarly, if we suffer a bad beat but can confidently put it down to variance, then psychologically we'll recover pretty quickly - we know that everyone suffers from the same whims of fortune.
However, if we lose a hand and put it down to the site rigging the deal, then one of two things happens. One, we get angry - not angry because we lost a hand but angry because we feel cheated. We all know what it's like to BE cheated, and our natural - and justified - reaction is a feeling of righteous ire and a strong desire to get even. Unfortunately, this emotion is the opposite of productive in poker, where we need to keep a clear, disciplined head, follow odds and reads, and NOT allow emotion to override ability.
Two, instead of studying the hand and looking for any mistakes WE might have made, we are denying any possible blame on our part. But if we're saying we don't make any mistakes, how can we learn from them? Bad beats are almost as useful - it can be just as instructive to look over a hand on which you suffered a bad beat and either discover that maybe you didn't play it optimally, or you DID play it well and there was nothing you could have done to prevent the loss. Both of these are useful and the latter should help you recover from your annoyance at losing the pot.
So, the thinking, winning poker player will understand variance and will treat lost hands as either "one of those things" - AA loses to 72o 12% of the time - or they will study lost pots for evidence of poor play on their part, and if they find it, they'll work on fixing it.
|