|
|
 Originally Posted by siknd
if the pot is 2$ on the turn, you have the current nuts and theres a flush draw out there, and you go all in for a hundred more, and he calls and hits his flush: i dont think that can be called variance, u should just expect to win the next four times in that situation.
I agree that that single event would be a bad beat; however, it would be negative variance if you didnt win the next four times or a proportional amount over a fairly short period of time. We are really just arguing semantics.
|