|
|
 Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
Yeah I know. Well I' m warning you now that what I' m about to say is mostly useless and will not make you a better poker player, so feel free leave now if you don't want to hear my rationalization.
I frequently put all of my chips in the middle based on stats gained from 30 hands or fewer. I don't really care that my estimates of true x are not as accurate as they could be.
i almost left after this ^, but i couldn't help but skim your post after i typed my initial response.
re your claim that someone's c-raise frequency could be negative after you have seen it happen. This is obviously ridiculous, and you don't understand that there are a number of types of statistical distributions. This reads like someone who encountered omg STANDARD DEVIATION WOW in high school and hasn't really progressed much from there
cool that you're posting though, i guess.
p.s. yep, it's been a while since i did graduate maths or statistics, so maybe my understanding is rusty and dated.
|
Reply With Quote