|
|
 Originally Posted by The Bean Counter
Back in the day when I was playing a lot of golf, I remember hearing that Jack Nicklaus never went into a round of golf or a practice session with more than one thought in his head about improving his swing. In my experience at the poker tables, I've found that the same concept can apply after a study session.
This is good. Often in poker you have pros and cons for every decision, the trick is to add the appropriate amount of weight to them. If it's a more complex idea it's probably best to keep it very limited how many of them you want to try out in your game. Having too many such ideas can leave you very confused!
Originally Posted by The Bean Counter
1) 3-betting for value
3-bet 25% of villain's opening range i.e. if villain opens 40% on the btn, 3-bet 10%. The rationale is that hero will be at least a 55% favourite against villain's whole range.
I don't think you can realistically implement this though. Better to look at the table action when deciding whether to 3bet or not, less just looking at your hand.
edit: lol sorry for replying to 2 random posts, I hadn't read you blog yet. Your game seems to be very sound, keep on trucking.
|
Reply With Quote