Baudib blog: Live poker/return to online in 2014?

Wouldn't a lead look very nutty with the board texture? Unless i have glaucoma it's a fairly dry board, and not many hands would continue.

Originally Posted by CheckCall34

Wouldn't a lead look very nutty with the board texture? Unless i have glaucoma it's a fairly dry board, and not many hands would continue.

Yeah, I agree, which is why I thought it'd be a good spot to c/c down with AQ in order to protect my checking range. I think it'd be better to lead on a board with more broadway draws.

Here's an example of a similar board texture in a 3-bet pot that a friend played. I think he may read this, so you should just register and post!

5-handed

Co ($250) Opens to $20
BTN ($500ish) flats
SB HERO ($450) raises to $100
BB folds
Co folds
BTN calls

Flop ($222)
Hero checks, BTN bets $100, Hero calls

Turn ($450)
Hero checks, BTN goes all in $300, Hero tank calls $250


Hero is good TAG, mostly plays straightforward, especially in this game. BTN isn't a great player, way too loose pre, definitely overplays some hands, but can do basic hand-reading. He bluffs, but generally not for huge amounts.

It was pretty apparent to me as an observer that SB has a very marginal hand. BTN knows SB never has a good hand when he checks this board, and is probably shoving a marginal hand himself. As mentioned, this board is generally terrible for 3-bettor's range, and much favors the flatter's range.