I am going to give higher stakes a try and I would really appreciate your tips and comments about playing higher stakes.
http://blog.flopturnriver.com/Pingviini.php
11-12-2005 08:22 AM
#1
| |
| |
| |
11-12-2005 10:10 AM
#2
| |
get rich or die trying | |
11-12-2005 10:37 AM
#3
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
11-12-2005 03:47 PM
#4
| |
Stay away from the 1000nl party game, play 600nl on party, or if you feel you must play 1000nl try UB, bodog or noble poker. | |
| |
11-12-2005 03:50 PM
#5
| |
| |
| |
11-12-2005 03:58 PM
#6
| |
sharky geo | |
11-12-2005 04:21 PM
#7
| |
DoGGz
Guest
|
Because the Party 1000nl game is one of the hardest on the net. Why play better players than you have to? |
11-12-2005 09:40 PM
#8
| |
Yeah, its definately beatable, but you have to be good, disciplined and ready to accept some pretty crappy variance for a small win rate. There are just greener pastures to graze in thats all. | |
| |
11-17-2005 07:19 PM
#9
| |
Play for the challenge not the money. Playing in a table full of sharks you will increase your skill level very fast. | |
| |
11-17-2005 07:21 PM
#10
| |
| |
| |
11-17-2005 08:42 PM
#11
| |
| |
11-17-2005 10:04 PM
#12
| |
It's one thing losing to donks who are sucking out, but playing against very high quality players is different. It may be worth playing at a game just because there is one very good player there, you can see how he or she plays preflop post flop, and take maybe emulate a few things they do if they indeed are very good. | |
| |
11-18-2005 03:33 AM
#13
| |
I want to play my best at the best games possible, that is, the easiest possible. I always learn something new and when my BR increases I will step up to the next level, that is nl400 again pretty soon. | |
| |
11-18-2005 04:05 AM
#14
| |
What's the saying? There is no point being the 8th best player in the world if the other players sitting at your table are the 7 best? Something like that. | |
| |
11-20-2005 12:02 PM
#15
| |
so who plays at party 1000NL then? Do hallingol and spirit rock etc play there? | |
11-21-2005 06:48 PM
#16
| |
| |
| |
11-22-2005 04:53 AM
#17
| |
Demi: that is what I pretty much think myself. I know that 25 buy-ins before moving up isnt necessary either but that is for making the stress about the money involved lesser. | |
| |
11-22-2005 05:27 AM
#18
| |
| |
11-22-2005 01:23 PM
#19
| |
you can just say 'ILOE' | |
11-23-2005 01:59 AM
#20
| |
And that I intend to do. That sort of lost its charm though.. | |
| |
11-23-2005 02:46 AM
#21
| |
I dunno, i like a tonne of buyins for high stakes pla because th consequence of busting is huge. | |
| |
11-23-2005 02:55 AM
#22
| |
I might twitch the requirement 5 buy-ins higher after nl400. This seems more than enough at these limits.. | |
| |
11-23-2005 02:58 AM
#23
| |
| |
12-05-2005 01:20 PM
#24
| |
Ping, | |
| |
12-05-2005 03:57 PM
#25
| |
WOOOHOO, somebody reads my blog!! | |
| |
12-05-2005 04:09 PM
#26
| |
Whew. Okay, I understood your blog post correctly then...it was just difficult (for me) trying to sort it all out. | |
| |
12-06-2005 01:09 PM
#27
| |
![]() ![]()
|
I read your blog too! Excellent stuff, and excellent going |
12-19-2005 04:56 PM
#28
| |
First of all Pingviini, I love your blog, it is updated regulary, and it contains some interesting poker content, plus its always fun to watch someone develop as a player. | |
12-19-2005 05:19 PM
#29
| |
raise AJ+ and 99+ any position continuation bet every flop. Limp 22-88. That should be enough to beat NL25 | |
12-19-2005 05:35 PM
#30
| |
| |
12-20-2005 02:03 AM
#31
| |
I would add some more marginal hands like T8s+ and 56s+ when folded to you on CO or so. If it seems that they are not folding PF or to your cbets tighten up. Like you said, tight OOP, looser on position. | |
| |
12-21-2005 09:08 AM
#32
| |
Thanks a lot. | |
12-30-2005 05:22 AM
#33
| |
I have been doing pretty decent in 3/6. Just wanted to promote my blog. | |
| |
12-30-2005 12:18 PM
#34
| |
pingviini, what site do you play 6-max at? I'm just playing NL 25 6-max at party atm and it suits me perfect, but I was wondering when I begin to move up in limits wether I should stay at party? | |
12-30-2005 07:46 PM
#35
| |
Party 6-max games are good all the way thru nl600 | |
| |
01-01-2006 06:51 AM
#36
| |
Any particular reason why nl1k games are so much harder than nl600 on party? | |
| |
01-04-2006 10:52 AM
#37
| |
I played an hour long session at 5/10 last night on Pokerstars. It wasn't that hard. I stepped in short with $500. There were a couple of real fish at the table. Most people are very aware obviously. It was a good learning experience. The one thing I found was that people get committed very easily when the pot gets to about $400. You can feel the emotion at the table (or was that just me?). I went down to $130 after a few moves gone bad. Then I trippled up on QQ against 99 and 22. After that I snapped off an all in flush bluff in a blind war for another double up. Made a few more moves that went well. Hit a full house and a straight. Ended up leaving with $1500 and feeling fortunate. | |
| |
01-04-2006 10:57 AM
#38
| |
I will not play on Stars for taxational reasons. Party 5/10 sounds like a toughie but what about prima, or crypto, iPoker (Noble)? | |
| |
01-26-2006 01:24 AM
#39
| |
Well the Party 5/10 NL 10-max game is a complete joke, but i assume you only play shorthanded. Yeh I would agree that 5/10 NL 6-max on Party is tough, with the likes of Liquid_Farts, lolotrickedu, RebuyFish, and Legandary_DonK to play against (if you do play there, avoid all of those players!) | |
| |
01-30-2006 03:55 AM
#40
| |
I wont be playing 5/10 until I get a 50k roll. I dropped quite a bit recently but I still have a winning recordin 5/10 SH. I just dont want to play with scared money and the huge swings at 5/10 require a big br and strong mental health. You end up toying with FE in big pots a lot more and I still have trouble identifying the best spots. | |
| |
02-22-2006 12:02 PM
#41
| |
| |
02-26-2006 07:48 PM
#42
| |
| |
| |
02-27-2006 04:17 PM
#43
| |
| |
03-02-2006 03:08 PM
#44
| |
| |
| |
03-07-2006 03:39 PM
#45
| |
| |
| |
03-07-2006 04:01 PM
#46
| |
| |
03-07-2006 08:09 PM
#47
| |
| |