|
One of my biggest leaks so far in cash games has been bluffing a lot and generally believing that every hand was a good hand to make some sort of move. Last night I 4-tabled 10NL with the focus on letting hands go and looking for better spots.
All in all, I was very pleased. I managed to get away from some hands that would look pretty standard, but in the past I probably would have tried a tricky play or two and gotten caught for a lot of chips.
Another aspect of my game that I want to work on is putting my opponents on hand ranges and more importantly, trusting those reads. Here's a hand to illustrate:
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (7 handed) Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)
Hero ($12.40)
UTG ($14.95)
MP1 ($15.55)
MP2 ($12.20)
CO ($1.75)
Button ($5)
SB ($1.75)
Preflop: Hero is BB with A , Q .
UTG calls $0.10, 1 fold, MP2 calls $0.10, 3 folds, Hero raises to $0.5, UTG calls $0.40, MP2 calls $0.40.
Flop: ($1.65) 2 , Q , 7 (3 players)
Hero bets $1, UTG raises to $3, MP2 folds, Hero raises to $5.5, UTG raises to $14.45, Hero calls $6.40 (All-In).
Turn: ($28) T (2 players, 1 all-in)
River: ($28) 4 (2 players, 1 all-in)
Final Pot: $25.45
UTG had 22 in this hand. My initial read after the flop was 22 or 77. Unfortunately, instead of trusting my instincts and laying the hand down, I convinced myself that he probably had KQ, JQ, or some other hand that I could beat. The hand worked out in my favor, but that doesn't really matter. The point is I made the correct read, but convinced myself my read was wrong. I need to trust my instincts.
One problem that is related to trusting my reads is that when I suspect I am beat but call anyway, there's a part of me that is satisfied with knowing that I was beat. It's almost like I would rather know I was beat and pay the guy off than save some money but risk folding the best hand.
Anyone else ever have that same problem?
|