|
|
 Originally Posted by ProZachNation
Originally Posted by LuckySlevin
I don't see the value in continuing at 2nl any more I've played 8000 hands and was break even over that stretch, I understand from talking to other people that there's no real difference between 2nl and 5nl - so I'm going to move up to 5nl now, I'd rather be break even over 5nl or just beating it than break even at 2nl or just beating it because at least I'll be developing some 5nl experience, and getting some hands in.
If you can not beat 2nl, you will not beat 5nl, so what then move up to 10nl, then 25nl then 50nl? Losing 4 buyins learning the game at 2nl costs you $8, losing 4 buyins at 5nl costs you $20 and so on and so forth.
Really you should easily be able to beat 2nl if you have any amount of work ethic. Not doing the work and just moving up is going to cost you so much more in terms of money and time spent.
But GL.
I disagree! rake sucks at all micro limits! Play is more coherent as you move up and I find that it would be better for everyone on FTR playing 2-10 nl to find the money to move to 25nl.
|
Reply With Quote