|
I finally got to the Casino at 3pm on Saturday, and walked up to the "high stakes" board to get my name on the list. I grabbed a buzzer from the floor person (kind of like they give you in some restaurants to tell you when your table is ready) They offer these for the games 10/20 through 75/150 as well as the 5-150 spread limit game.
I checked out the 20/40 table for a while. There was only one guy that I knew sitting down at the time, a pro grinder from not Jamaica, but some island with a similar accent. One of my favorite quotes from him was "I make mah livin from playas too stubbon to give dey hands back to da dealah" The game looked soft enough, at any rate. So I went to the black jack tables to pass some time waiting for a spot to open up.
Before I ever got into poker, I read every book there is on blackjack, and tought myself how to count cards. I also developed a way to win guaranteed as long as you don't lose 17 hands in a row,(if you do, then, you're pretty much fucked) so I typically do pretty well. Blackjack is a good way for me to work on my concentration skills. This afternoon was awesome though. I found a $25 min table with 2 players at it, and jumped in at the end of the shoe. I bought in for $500, and at the end of 1 hour I was up $450!
At 4PM, The casino opened up a "must move" 20/40 game. This means that a new table opens up, but as players drop out of the main game, players from the must move game must move over to keep the main game full.
I took my seat at the table, used my black jack chips to buy in for $1000. I posted the BB and my first hand I was dealt AQ (sweet ) and lost (sad ) down $100....
The next hand I was dealt KQo in the small blind, Which immediately made me think of the thread in the Limit forum where we discussed this situation specifically.
So, this hand I dedicate to Fnord and Hyper.
MP1 calls, CO calls, sb(me) completes, bb checks.
Flop: QJ3 (4SBs)
I bet, bb folds, MP1 folds, CO raises, I 3-bet, CO calls.
Turn K (5BBs)
I bet, CO calls
River 3 (7BBs)
I bet, CO calls
I show KQ, CO mucks,
I win $360 - $150 that I put in the pot for a net of $210.
Quick note: There is no rake at the 20/40 game and above. Instead the Casino charges "time" Which at Casino Arizona is $7 per half hour per player.
This is my initial impression of my table:
Seat 1- An LAgg, but experienced. It is often more profitable at the middle limits to be very aggressive, and play more hands than the "book" tells you to. A VP$IP for these players is probably nearing 30%, but some are very profitable if they can find the right games (preferably a tight passive game that they can control.)
Approximate chip count: $350
Seat 2- a recreational player playing for "fun" a number of high stakes players are not there necessarily to win, just to play.
Chip count $ 800
Seat 3- a retired guy, and another recreational players. You see a few people bleeding through their pensions around here.
Chip count $250
Seat 4- another LAgg, but this one is weak and probably doesn't fully understand the relative value of hands as they change based on other players actions. He plays hands too hard and too far, but probably has some short term profits which make him keep coming back thinking that he can beat the game.
$500, but he has definitely bought at least one more rack of chips since sitting at the table.
Seat 5- A tight agressive, aware player with a lot of hold em experience. He is willing to raise to exploit small edges. He is probably an overall winning player.
$1500
Seat 6- He is playing a solid tight agressive style, but unlike seat 5, seems to be willing to change gears to loose agressive when the situation fits. Judging by his table manner and dress he is probably a loose agressive personality that has developed the discipline to play his "A" game for a short time.
$450
Seat 7- Is me. I tend to play tight pasiive when losing and loose agressive when winning Whic hkeeps people off guard and maximizes my winnings while minimzing my losses to an extent. (I am agressive by nature, so when I say I play passive, I am nowhere near a true tight passive player)
$1000
Seat 8- A tight, passive woman who plays only premium hands, but tends to go too far with them. By always tending to start with the best hand however, she probably wins as often as she loses.
$650
Seat 9- Another tight passive woman with many of the same traits as seat 8. She tends t oplay her cards more than the players, and will sometimes raise and reraise with a good second best hand.
$1000
It is hard to judge a player's ability by the number of chips they have, since you can buy more chips at any time and there is no maximum amount of chips you may have at the table. Also, winning players often "color up" chips and the $500 pink chips are hard to decipher across the table from the $5 red chips. Also there may be a stack of $100 black chips that you miss somewhere, although black chips typically come from the blackjack tables and may indicate a "gambler" more than a winning player. The cardroom for some reason also is not as strict about players removing chips from the table at high limits as they are in the small stakes games.
In general however, less than $500 in 20/40 is generally a losing player and more than $1500 is generally a winning player.
|