|
 Originally Posted by bjsaust
Do people prefer to see results or not in hands posted in the Op rather than in a strat forum?
i don't mind either way. If you want huge hand analysis etc, then maybe it's better not to include results, if you're not so worried about that and you're telling a story about a session then include them. Maybe best is to include results hidden?
hands are interesting
hand 1 - nh, wonder at mp's range? AJs types of hands? if he's TAG he shouldn't have a set or straight here with the monster drawy board.
hand 2 - QTs seems pretty loose from ep pre-flop, but i'm a FR nit flop is where the important decision is. Like you, I c-bet here all day, but that may be a leak? vs the check-raise it's hard without a read on how he may play draws or perceive you. CR flop, lead turn is a strong line.
hand 3 - i like to raise the flop with the double-gutter. As played i call the river min-bet and take a note. Good for your image too...
hand 4 - I like. Pre-flop K6s is ok to call with, simply for high card value + suited goodness
hand 5 - I don't like calling two streets post-flop here. I also wonder about pre-flop. blind vs blind you obviously raise any limp, but vs a steal there has to be some 3-betting and some folding going on. J8o is too weak to call. Fold is standard on the king river as played.
hand 6 - nice to see a wide 3-bet range based on reads. His range for calling I has to be ? difficult to estimate without some stats. c-bet is standard, turn is a good barrel card unless you think his range is AQ+/TT+. River check-call or bet-fold are both fine, LAG villains struggle to check two streets behind which is why I like check-call here sometimes.
|