|
|
 Originally Posted by kmind
I'll try to find this. ISF - Revision Of ISF Theorem at the bottom
I do not see why unless he has Ad and a 6 you aren't really thinking of his range then. He can really only have AdQd
I don't get why. He can't have 66, 88, A6s, A8s, JJ+ with a diamond?
Originally Posted by kmind
Hmmm, I'm out of position. If I was IP I would have called. Ok so are you bluffing or what? I'd just fold and IP I wouldn't auto say call. I think calling and folding are fine. You'll face an aggressive cbetting strategy when the best you can flop in most cases is a draw or TPGK which is losing to all of his holdings if he has something too
So don't 3bet here against a nit because I'm only getting called by better? So then what's the point of calling OOP? In case he's doing this with worse? If I call and he cbets and I have TP then what? If I 3bet and he shoves I can fold. If I 3bet and he calls then I'm probably behind. I just don't get calling here.
Originally Posted by kmind
So you really want me to open up IP with hands such as J8s, 54o, K9o, J5o (NOTE: ADD "against nits")? This seems to fit the aggro part of TAGG but not the Tight part. So when I open these hands and miss flop then ??? or if I hit TPWK then ??? I've never considered myself TAGG or LAGG or any of that. I strongly agree you should think like that. No one has a style. At least they shouldn't. Your play is based on each opponent. So yes, opening a TON of hands will be profitable in this spot. They are only playing like 8% of the time. If you miss the flop then c/f most of the time. Why? Because folding is neutral EV so it doesn't matter as you already exploited their glaring weakness.
Got it.
|
Reply With Quote