Rilla,and anyone else, could you draw conclusions from my 6max graph? I run at what I assume average figures, 22/6/ (and i *think* about 4 TA, cant check right now). i actually play 5 max, extremely loose tables normally quite aggressive aswell, eg NL50 Ave pot $15+, players to flop 60%+ on the pokerroom network.

i cannot understand it.. my graph looks SOOO much different to everyone elses, and soo much different to how my graphs normally look at 8 or 10max.

The varience seemed stomachable at first because very frequently the pots simply went the wrong way when I had 50-150bigblinds in as a 50-80%+ fav... lately from 10k-15k hands at 5max i think my performance has dropped and the graph has now shown a downwards trend from the ~10k point. Lately i've began to feel a bit like.. fuck .. ive not done very well on my transition to 5-6max.. hell my graph looks wierd i must be doing some major shit wrong in my game.. and its started to downhearten me and lesson my confidence.

Now, I know this quantity of hands isnt enough to look at the winrate or even the skew of the graph, however the graph just looks alot different to everyone elses and how i htink it should be.. like way more frequent peaks and troughs :shrugs: whats that all about!?

Its began to do my head in.. ive been studying more than ever lately... and havent seen any results - only a really wierd looking graph and not even a confidence boast,

I've started having an idea of scrapping hold'em completely.. for 6months or a year - so that I can really focus, learn and study omaha and 7stud, and the hi/lo varieties - so that hopefully this will give me a massive nice break from holdem and I assume this to be another approach to improving my holdem game - and hope to return to 5-6max as a far better player / hand reader.

(...this break cant happen until I've finished my last 50% betsson bonus )

Any thouths / suggestions?