|
 Originally Posted by ImSavy
Thanks :P
Pokers actually been going really well, got a stake with some coaching on a 50/50 profit split and I'm currently crushing 10nl zoom for about 6bb/100 AIEV all be it over a smallish sample.
Aim is to be playing 25nl zoom at the start of next year and make a SN run ending the year playing 50nl zoom, maybe even 100nl should be possible if I put in the study.
Np. I was just looking through to see if any fish had luckboxed a score and spotted one! Seems an odd payout structure though for a 4-handed shootout where everybody is all-in every hand - the Advanced shootout paid nearly 50% of runners, which is stupid in a tournament of this structure.
I've got mixed feelings about Zoom. On the one hand, most of the profit at the tables comes from table and seat selection (which isn't possible at Zoom ofc). On the other hand, you can play a bunch of hands but still get some time to make tricky decisions compared to 10-12 tabling standard, since you don't have to routine fold hands on the side and move your mouse around like maniac. I suspect the average player is weak at Zoom too - thoughts?
Your aims seem more than reasonable and hitting SN at 50nl is doable if you 4-table Zoom and average around 55 hours per month. 6bb/100 is good enough to move up too as long as your sample is 50k hands+.
|