Wow, my first thought was monster on the flop, with a mid pair less likely but still part of his range.
I don't think the stackoff is very good in a vacuum, but given history I can see the logic....
09-22-2008 02:56 PM
#11
| |
Wow, my first thought was monster on the flop, with a mid pair less likely but still part of his range. | |
| |