1st ammendment violated?

[Pelion]

Im not sure what you mean by "there probably werent any children,"

That was a joke

anyways you seem to have a misunderstanding of the purpose of the constitution. It isnt supposed to cover everything, and was made intentionally vague. The constitution does not act the same why laws do, it does not provide a black and white basis for legal and illegal, moral and immoral, it does not "define appropriate behavior," laws do.

Yes, but it defines what sort of laws are allowed to be written. Hence gun control laws not being passed because they are unconstitutional.

I dont think anybody has made an argument for allowing child porn under freedom of the press as that doesnt even really make sense.

So what exactly is the "first ammendment violated?" title all about. I really dont see anything about this case that violates the first amendment. Really, please explain it if you know because I have totally missed it.

I dont think anybody is making a first amendment complaint here

Reread the thread title.