|
|
 Originally Posted by JKDS
@Mojo: Rilla's thinkin what im thinking.
Arrgghhhh! I just spent an hour replying to this post, and it got wiped when firefox crashed. I'm not going to spend that much time again. Sorry in advance if it falls short on thoroughness.
Summary:
Measurements are necessary to compare findings.
Experts in molecular biology, among others, support your domino theory.
Experts in QM describe their findings in terms of complex probability distribution functions, which themselves can't be directly observed. However when appropriate mathematical operations are performed on the distribution functions, all of the properties of the particle which can be observed come out of them. QM is hugely successful and based on a language of probabilities.
So, given the microscopic world is described with a language of probability, how can the macroscopic world be otherwise?
|
Reply With Quote