|
|
My point was simple and I thought it was pretty clear.
Reality doesn't give a hoot about your best description of it. That the vehicle of probability is so useful in our description of the universe doesn't mean
 Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
that uncertainty dominates the microscopic world
You shoulda said uncertainty dominates our understanding of the microscopic world.
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
And did you show that probability is what dominates the tiny-verse or did you demonstrate that our best understanding of the tiny-verse is made by the vehicle of probability?
Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
What would be the difference? I honestly don't know that those are 2 different things.
The difference is stark. On the one side is us and our brains and how they describe the universe and on the other is the universe and how it is carried across all that is.
The only language that can <perfect metric> describe reality is reality. And we don't speak that.
And don't think that I'm leading you with some argument. I'm standing in one spot.
Besides
Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
The long history of the EPR "paradox" has shown that the randomness associated with particle states is thoroughly described by specific probability functions.
You know it as well as I.
|
Reply With Quote