Oh, are you saying you want me to describe it to specifically you? It being something of some meaning.
It's not an argument. It's something of incredible study. So we have the answer key and we have a good process for reading that answer key, and we've been at it for 400 years <been at it for XYZ>.
But after 400 years <but after XYZ>, we still don't know how to decipher that answer key perfectly, but we're still at it.
We're real good. Real real good. But we aren't perfect. We just have the german rigor.
People claim to know perfect, they describe perfect as some God or some such, but that's the nonsense from fools trying to cut ahead.
The funny thing is, we'll never know perfect. But we will know real well. And that real well becomes real real well, and then real real real well.
In summation, science knows real well. Science tries to decipher the answer key. And we're gonna stick at it but we won't know reality in terms of reality, only in terms of <human>.
That's as best as I can do to be wholly honest.
Reply With Quote