If you think about it, Obama is a free market champion. The capitalist-constitutional view for healthcare insurance is to have private industry run everything while the government guarantees that the law applies to everybody equally. This is basically what the ACA is. I wonder if the libertarian/anarcho-capitalists, who basically end up using theory of mass insurance to explain why protections exist in a stateless society, believe that even without a state to guarantee access to insurance, all are insured. Given that virtually everybody except a small handful of extreme hardliners thinks that the state should exist in order to guarantee these sorts of civil rights, I wonder why people are against the ACA in the first place. It's a libertarian's wet-dream. Well, if the libertarian understood his own ideology, that is