|
 Originally Posted by rong
You just dodged questions in order to continue stating your dogma. I think this conversation is done.
I agree that long term capitalism would be expected to provide more growth, Greater innovation and greater efficiency. However it comes at a short term cost. Which is the less received by those at the bottom of the food chain whilst we wait for progress to make it cheaper so that more people can afford it.
I don't think that cost is acceptable in some areas, you do.
You can show me the questions if you like. I responded to the one I saw.
As for the short/long term cost thing, that's probably accurate. The short term wouldn't last that long, and the long term is ultimately what we're trying to make better, since the long term today is the short term a few years from now. Iceland is a good example that some like to use for why the short term pain of jailing fraudsters that the rest of the world supposedly didn't jail only caused them extra pain for a short period of time but by now they're already doing better than most of the rest of the world.
|