|
|
 Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Yes, my point exactly. And when you look at the reasons to accept evolution versus the reason to accept markets, one is left desperately wanting.
I wouldn't argue with that. Though I'm not a fan of the disparaging language. The answer to "is evolution true?" is "about as true as you can get" while the answer to "are markets true?" (a weird question, but whatever) is "all signs point towards yes, but if you're picking the nits, it's not the most robustly known thing in the world".
And I contend that in a rhetorical sense, it does try to give them unearned veracity.
Sure. I think you could describe arguments that way.
|
Reply With Quote