|
|
 Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
Well, if you accept that 1 means 1, then you also accept that + is worth exploring, then math.
The labels and names may be whatever, but the sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... is there.
So the argument that 1 + 1 = 2 is a universal truth is interesting.
The question of whether or not it would be true if there were no mind to learn it is also interesting.
Yes, I agree that math is worth exploring.
But math is rules making where physics is rules-exploring (or some better term). And I much prefer exploring the rules of the working world than exploring what can be crafted with clever rules.
There still is a lot of overlap.
|
Reply With Quote