|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
To a degree. The problem with disputing climate change is that you get treated the same as flat earthers, creationists, 9/11 truthers, holocaust deniers. You'd quickly be cast to the fringes.
Climate change is way too politicised for me to consider it a hard science. There's too much external influence.
You bring forward your hypotheses and other scientists proceed to tear them to shreds. If they are bulletproof, they will withstand the intense scrutiny by other scientists, and if not, they will falter.
The scientific method is an ongoing process. This is why science has little bullshit. It's not based on faith nor feelings, rather objective testing and retesting and scrutiny. You cannot be cast to the fringes if your data holds. If it doesn't and still you claim such findings, then yes, you will be declared a loon.
|