Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

Best Running Back Of All Time???

View Poll Results: Best Running Back Of All Time???

Voters
30. You may not vote on this poll
  • Barry Sanders

    17 56.67%
  • Emmitt Smith

    2 6.67%
  • Walter Payton

    8 26.67%
  • Jim Brown

    2 6.67%
  • O.J. Simpson

    1 3.33%
  • Eric Dickerson

    0 0%
Results 1 to 52 of 52
  1. #1

    Default Best Running Back Of All Time???

    Whos your pick and why???
  2. #2
    Sweetness. He was the model 3 down back, he worked out hard and ran harder, he never backed down and always went for that extra yard, he never talked much smack and just smacked people on the field.
    Oh yeah, and he gets cool points for those endzone leaps.

    Never saw Jim Brown, but I hear he was good. Barry would have been better with an O-line stronger than papier-mache. Barry's problem was he could single handedly score a touchdown in a series or kill a series. He was always like: 2yds, 0yds, 2yds, -3yds, 0yds, 1yd, 88yds.
    Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
  3. #3
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,668
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    Bo Jackson: What If...

    Also, Jim Brown + Sweetness + Tomlinson
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  4. #4
    a500lbgorilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    28,082
    Location
    himself fucker.
    aren't we forgetting Mendenhall?
    <a href=http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png target=_blank>http://i.imgur.com/kWiMIMW.png</a>
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
    Bo Jackson: What If...
    My fav of all time and the reason im a Raider Fan.
  6. #6
    bigred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,437
    Location
    Nest of Douchebags
    barry
    LOL OPERATIONS
  7. #7
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    This question always cracks me up because people always blurt out "Barry Sanders" (an absolutely phenomenol runner) with such certainty but the person is never even remotely qualified to answer that. Like they certainly never watched any of them play and never watched any film on any of the backs (but they have watched a highlight reel or two and have friends with strong opinions).

    I'm going to buck that trend, and the whole unquestioned browns loyalty thing, and go with Walter Payton.
  8. #8
    Great post, Lukie, totally agree. I always like your sports posts because unlike most people, you don't blurt out strong opinions unless you actually have a reason for that opinion.
  9. #9
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    man, if Sanders just played a few more years he could so easily have made this *not* even a question.
  10. #10
    will641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5,266
    Location
    getting my swell on
    good post lukie.

    i honestly didnt watch football when he played (although i saw him live(although i didnt know who he was at the time)), but one of my coaches who is a huge sports fan who described him as very over rated. now its possible he had some bears bias in there, but he said barry would basically get stuffed like 4-5 plays, but then bust for a 20 yarder or w/e. not the kind of back where you could run 3 plays, and have a decent expectation of picking up the first.
    Cash Rules Everything Around Me.
  11. #11
    Barry Sanders obv because I'm a homer.

    Also, all those other guys played for good teams. Barry put up his numbers playing for the Lions and had no offensive line to run behind.
  12. #12
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by WildBobAA
    Barry Sanders obv because I'm a homer.

    Also, all those other guys played for good teams. Barry put up his numbers playing for the Lions and had no offensive line to run behind.
    Not to say that he had an all-world line, but he had some good players to run behind e.g. Lomas Brown and Kevin Glover.

    Add this to the folklore.
  13. #13
    Lukie why are you picking Payton over the other people?
  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    Quote Originally Posted by WildBobAA
    Barry Sanders obv because I'm a homer.

    Also, all those other guys played for good teams. Barry put up his numbers playing for the Lions and had no offensive line to run behind.
    Not to say that he had an all-world line, but he had some good players to run behind e.g. Lomas Brown and Kevin Glover.

    Add this to the folklore.
    Its not just the line that allows you to run the ball. He never had a passing game to take the pressure off of him.

    He may not be the clear cut best of all time, but hes definately the most talented and funnest to watch.
  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by wesrman
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
    Bo Jackson: What If...
    My fav of all time and the reason im a Raider Fan.
    Does that make you a Royals fan too?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    man, if Jim Brown just played a few more years he could so easily have made this *not* even a question.
    FYP
    Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Silly String
    Quote Originally Posted by wesrman
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
    Bo Jackson: What If...
    My fav of all time and the reason im a Raider Fan.
    Does that make you a Royals fan too?
    No it doesnt.

    Im a Jays fan, but i havent really liked baseball since i was little.
  17. #17
    lolzzz_321's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    7,476
    Location
    My ice is polarized
    where is priest holmes?
  18. #18
  19. #19
    bigred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,437
    Location
    Nest of Douchebags
    Can I change my vote to Tom Brady?
    LOL OPERATIONS
  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by bigred
    Can I be any gayer?
    FYP.
  21. #21
    OJ juked a murder charge
    Quote Originally Posted by mrhappy333
    I didn't think its Bold to bang some chick with my bro. but i guess so... thats +EV in my book.
  22. #22
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...
    Regie Bush

    And wes, your sig is really ghey.
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
  23. #23
    Shaun Alexander
  24. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by swiggidy
    Regie Bush

    And wes, your sig is really ghey.
    Better???


    I voted for Walter Payton BTW.
  25. #25
    swiggidy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    7,876
    Location
    Waiting in the shadows ...
    yeah, but I still adblocked it cuz moving shit tilts me
    (\__/)
    (='.'=)
    (")_(")
  26. #26
    the most talented was probably Sanders. The most accomplished are payton and smith. The best... idk they were all incredibly good.
  27. #27
    Ragnar4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,184
    Location
    Billings, Montana
    Barry Sanders and it's not even close.

    & LOL at the idea that Sanders was behind a "Good line" He recently said himself that if he were behind the Broncos or Dallas Front 5 he could have done some pretty spectaular things.

    Hell, I'll bet 50% of his yards came from broken running plays that went the other way.. then the other way... then the other way... then.. you get the point.
    The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes
  28. #28
    mrhappy333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,722
    Location
    Mohegan Sun or MGM Springfield
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    man, if Sanders just played a few more years he could so easily have made this *not* even a question.
    I agree 100%. WTF the dude just ups and retires when he's on the edge of Super Immortal
    3 3 3 I'm only half evil.
  29. #29
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    Quote Originally Posted by mrhappy333
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    man, if Sanders just played a few more years he could so easily have made this *not* even a question.
    I agree 100%. WTF the dude just ups and retires when he's on the edge of Super Immortal
    he wanted to be able to walk when he is 50 years old. cant really blame him.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  30. #30
    Jim Brown
    12312 yds in 9 seasons
    four-12 game seasons and five-14 game seasons
    5.2 ypc
    /thread
  31. #31
    I'd really like to be able to say Jim Brown, because that guy was a monster who seems to have had everything you could want in an RB. It just doesn't seem right to make that claim just based on footage, stats, and hearsay. It's about whole games, not just big plays. So, I'm going with Walter Payton. Feel comfortable as I saw Payton play a fair amount and saw Barry play lots, including 10-12 times live.

    If RB were just a matter of playmaking/freestyle running, then Barry wins hands down. But an RB has to be able to make short yardage as well as big plays. An RB has to catch passes out of the backfield. An RB has to block. That's all part of the job description.

    Short yardage: You just don't want to give Barry the ball on 3rd and 2, unless it's just for kicks to see what might happen (didn't stop the Lions from doing it all the time). Payton could run reliably between the tackles as well as bust it outside.
    Blocking: Barry deserves a lot of credit for effort, but he was just an average to good blocker. Payton more solid there.
    Catching passes: Barry was above average - even good - catching the ball, but Payton was very good to awesome in that category.

    Of course, Barry would have been more productive if he had a better line. But, as noted above, his line wasn't awful, just mediocre. It's not fair to say that the Lions didn't have a passing game though, since the Run and Shoot was definitely a dynamic and dangerous passing game. The Lions never had great QB's, but they did have some awesome receivers. In fact, that wide-open offense (that gave him so much space past the front line) probably accentuated Barry's greatest strengths - his vision, cuts, brilliance in space, and sheer playmaking ability - as well as any offense could. Speculation about stats aside, it would have kinda sucked to see Barry in place of Emmitt Smith in the Cowboys' offense.
  32. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by metaxy6
    I'd really like to be able to say Jim Brown, because that guy was a monster who seems to have had everything you could want in an RB. It just doesn't seem right to make that claim just based on footage, stats, and hearsay. It's about whole games, not just big plays. So, I'm going with Walter Payton. Feel comfortable as I saw Payton play a fair amount and saw Barry play lots, including 10-12 times live.

    If RB were just a matter of playmaking/freestyle running, then Barry wins hands down. But an RB has to be able to make short yardage as well as big plays. An RB has to catch passes out of the backfield. An RB has to block. That's all part of the job description.

    Short yardage: You just don't want to give Barry the ball on 3rd and 2, unless it's just for kicks to see what might happen (didn't stop the Lions from doing it all the time). Payton could run reliably between the tackles as well as bust it outside.
    Blocking: Barry deserves a lot of credit for effort, but he was just an average to good blocker. Payton more solid there.
    Catching passes: Barry was above average - even good - catching the ball, but Payton was very good to awesome in that category.

    Of course, Barry would have been more productive if he had a better line. But, as noted above, his line wasn't awful, just mediocre. It's not fair to say that the Lions didn't have a passing game though, since the Run and Shoot was definitely a dynamic and dangerous passing game. The Lions never had great QB's, but they did have some awesome receivers. In fact, that wide-open offense (that gave him so much space past the front line) probably accentuated Barry's greatest strengths - his vision, cuts, brilliance in space, and sheer playmaking ability - as well as any offense could. Speculation about stats aside, it would have kinda sucked to see Barry in place of Emmitt Smith in the Cowboys' offense.
    This post belongs in Canton, for it is HOF material.
  33. #33
    bode's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    8,043
    Location
    slow motion
    Quote Originally Posted by blackatom
    Jim Brown
    12312 yds in 9 seasons
    four-12 game seasons and five-14 game seasons
    5.2 ypc
    /thread
    +1 for Jim Brown. He was such a badass.
    eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
  34. #34
    Who voted for the Juice???
  35. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    This question always cracks me up because people always blurt out "Barry Sanders" (an absolutely phenomenol runner) with such certainty but the person is never even remotely qualified to answer that. Like they certainly never watched any of them play and never watched any film on any of the backs (but they have watched a highlight reel or two and have friends with strong opinions).

    I'm going to buck that trend, and the whole unquestioned browns loyalty thing, and go with Walter Payton.
    I'm still waiting for the explanation from this post. I mean you say you hate people who just say Barry for no reason and then you do the same thing with Walter Payton and give no actual explanation as to why you picked him, it just seems pretty hypocritical. (and then will and mcat praise you because they also hate ppl who blurt out an answer.........wtf?) And no, I'm not just saying this because I love Barry because I know you're thinking that.
  36. #36
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,668
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    Gale Sayers in not on the poll
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  37. #37
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    Quote Originally Posted by WildBobAA
    Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
    This question always cracks me up because people always blurt out "Barry Sanders" (an absolutely phenomenol runner) with such certainty but the person is never even remotely qualified to answer that. Like they certainly never watched any of them play and never watched any film on any of the backs (but they have watched a highlight reel or two and have friends with strong opinions).

    I'm going to buck that trend, and the whole unquestioned browns loyalty thing, and go with Walter Payton.
    I'm still waiting for the explanation from this post. I mean you say you hate people who just say Barry for no reason and then you do the same thing with Walter Payton and give no actual explanation as to why you picked him, it just seems pretty hypocritical. (and then will and mcat praise you because they also hate ppl who blurt out an answer.........wtf?) And no, I'm not just saying this because I love Barry because I know you're thinking that.
    lol, I think it's pretty clear what I said applies to me as well. also nowhere did I ever use the word 'hate' or really imply it. I just think it's kind of funny. again, I'm not qualified to answer this because it's not something I've ever studied, and was brought up on baseball and to a lesser extent, basketball. I do watch a ton of football now and in the last couple years I've tried my hardest to aquire a deeper understanding of the game and I don't believe statistics are the best way to answer this question.

    To directly answer your question, the biggest reason is because a couple peoples' opinions who I respect greatly (coaches, former players, and the like) are really, *really* high on Walter Payton, for many of the same reasons as the first response in this thread.
  38. #38
    not only was barry the best rb, but the best athlete of all time imo.

    he was amazing in high school, and was likely undrugged while in the nfl, which is for the most part unheard of. his line and offensive passing strats were so bad that the only time he got anywhere was when he made his own holes, and always vs a defense that didnt have to spend much effort in stopping the pass but in stopping barry. playing against the lions was essentially playing against barry. stop barry, and you stop the lions.

    barry was respected by authorities and players within the nfl as the best rb. i believe walter payton even personally told barry he was the best, but dont quote me on that. very rarely if ever was he successfully taken on one on one. barry's agility was so amazing that rod woodson tore his acl just attempting to tackle him.

    in an attempt to simulate what catching barry was like an opposing nfl team spent some time chasing a chicken around a field.

    barry didnt care about records and personal victories, he cared about the team and the team victories. the only record he was getting into caring about was during the year he was speculated to break the career rushing record, yet he quit short of the goal because he realized that detroit lions management didnt care about winning games. he was as selfless as they come.

    wrt skill, usain bolt is the barry sanders of 100m sprinting.
  39. #39
    will641's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5,266
    Location
    getting my swell on
    "barry was respected by authorities and players within the nfl as the best rb. i believe walter payton even personally told barry he was the best, but dont quote me on that. very rarely if ever was he successfully taken on one on one. barry's agility was so amazing that rod woodson tore his acl just attempting to tackle him."

    lol did you copy that out of a biography or something?
    Cash Rules Everything Around Me.
  40. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by will641
    "barry was respected by authorities and players within the nfl as the best rb. i believe walter payton even personally told barry he was the best, but dont quote me on that. very rarely if ever was he successfully taken on one on one. barry's agility was so amazing that rod woodson tore his acl just attempting to tackle him."

    lol did you copy that out of a biography or something?
    no those are my words

    i read and watch a shitton of non-fiction/documentaries so sometimes my grammar reflects that. i have read barry's autobiography maybe two times.
  41. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    i have read barry's autobiography maybe two times.
    Nice.
  42. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by wesrman
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    i have read barry's autobiography maybe two times.
    Nice.
    ive watched his video included with the biography about 20 times, and all his highlights on youtube another 20 times. he is definitely the man

    but what i find probably most amazing is how dominating he was in high school. thats strong evidence that he didnt juice for the big league, and i strongly believe that pretty much every top top athlete in mega competitive high impact sports for the last two decades is on steroids. if they werent then we'd be seeing a large divide between the best and the absolute best players because steroids have a huge impact on strength, speed, and recovery.

    barry otoh could have been one who didnt juice because it doesnt look like he got a whole lot better since high school, and he's not that big, fast, or strong. he was just agile like crazy, and drugs dont affect that as much as they do pure strength and speed due to the higher need for coordination with agility. he's always ran circles around his competition. also his need for recovery was no doubt lower than all other rb's because his running style didnt let him get hit that hard that often. had he played forever like emmitt he would have likely played several years longer than any other rb due to the injury prevention of his rushing technique.
  43. #43
    Chopper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    4,611
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    toss up between barry and emmit. records show barry was best at "yardage before contact." and, emmit was best at "yards after contact."

    combine them both and you get jim brown...lol. i just never saw him play, or he may very well be my vote. dickerson was sweet, juice is a criminal, and sweetness carried a team on his back for years.

    my honorable mention: tony dorsett. #33 FTW!
    LHE is a game where your skill keeps you breakeven until you hit your rush of random BS.

    Nothing beats flopping quads while dropping a duece!
  44. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Chopper
    toss up between barry and emmit. records show barry was best at "yardage before contact." and, emmit was best at "yards after contact."

    combine them both and you get jim brown...lol. i just never saw him play, or he may very well be my vote. dickerson was sweet, juice is a criminal, and sweetness carried a team on his back for years.

    my honorable mention: tony dorsett. #33 FTW!
    you sure its not that emmitt was good at running through hallways created by his awesome line?
  45. #45
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    Quote Originally Posted by Chopper
    emmit was best at "yards after contact."
    you sure its not that emmitt was good at running through hallways created by his awesome line?
    Interesting statistic since it is a largely held belief that the Dallas O-line and not Emmit are responsible for his success. Well a belief held by DueceDuece haters anyway. I can't see how the O-Line has much bearing if he was a YAC leader much of his career.
    Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
  46. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by Silly String
    Quote Originally Posted by wufwugy
    Quote Originally Posted by Chopper
    emmit was best at "yards after contact."
    you sure its not that emmitt was good at running through hallways created by his awesome line?
    Interesting statistic since it is a largely held belief that the Dallas O-line and not Emmit are responsible for his success. Well a belief held by DueceDuece haters anyway. I can't see how the O-Line has much bearing if he was a YAC leader much of his career.
    offensive strategies and skill of blockers will play a big role here.

    emmitts blockers were amazing, and due to being so good they providing larger gaps between emmitt and his would be tacklers. what this does is allows emmitt to be running faster (harder to tackle) easier while the defenses first contacts with him were often from a less advantageous angle with less force behind them and with fewer points of contact per individual

    barry otoh was not given a good blocking offense strategy (his line may have actually been pretty decent, but he often didnt have a fullback or tight end not to mention other highly important factors, and so his opposition was not as easily held at bay and so first contact would be at points where tackling him was easier due to things like him not having built up speed, tacklers being less hindered by blockers and thus being able to attack from a more advantageous angle with more points of contacts and force.

    its one thing to break the tackle of a linebackers outstretched arm while being thrusted back by a fullback, yet an entirely different thing running straight into a linebackers zone and still juking him. the latter is something that only a couple rbs have ever been able do regardless of luck, but it was what barry did incessantly.

    a statistic may be correct in isolation, but never should one be singly used to evaluate the reasons behind an outcome.
  47. #47
    I agree and poker stats are the same way, but YAC has to count for something. Most 1st contacts would not be from an outstreched arm. I just felt I should give a +1 for Emmit as he is constantly run down for having the best O-line in the game during the 90's.
    Oops, my HEM code just arrived, I gotta jet. Later.
    Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
  48. #48
    Jack Sawyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,668
    Location
    Jack-high straight flush motherfucker
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivlxyOGSh2c&NR=1


    A) HOF after 68 games
    B) Refers to himself in 3rd person
    My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...


    Cogito ergo sum

    VHS is like a book? and a book is like a stack of kindles.
    Hey, I'm in a movie!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdwe3ArFWA
  49. #49
  50. #50
    The_OG_Rocco Guest
    Anyone but Orenthal Simpson.
    He's a fkng wife beater, an abuser and a murderer.
    So FK him and anyone who supports him.
    His eternal days of suffering in Hades will come soon enough.
    The rat bastard!
  51. #51
    bigred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    15,437
    Location
    Nest of Douchebags
    Quote Originally Posted by The_OG_Rocco
    Anyone but Orenthal Simpson.
    He's a fkng wife beater, an abuser and a murderer.
    So FK him and anyone who supports him.
    His eternal days of suffering in Hades will come soon enough.
    The rat bastard!
    typical leftist response imo
    LOL OPERATIONS
  52. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by The_OG_Rocco
    Anyone but Orenthal Simpson.
    He's a fkng wife beater, an abuser and a murderer.
    So FK him and anyone who supports him.
    His eternal days of suffering in Hades will come soon enough.
    The rat bastard!
    He was found not guilty ldo.

    Set loose the juice imo.

    Besides "Nicole simpson cant rap" remember.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •