Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

*** The Chess Thread ***

Results 1 to 75 of 130

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    The black Q can't leave the diagonal without check because then RxB mate. But if white allows the Black Q to check, then takes the Q, then Black is only left with pxR(Q) and on the next move it's stalemate.

    White can remove the checking possibility by 1. Kg7

    then if black plays 1... pxR(Q), 2. QxQ and it's mate in 3


    so black would have to play 1... either Qd6 or Qe5 (Qc7 loses after 2. BxQ pxR(Q) then 3. RxB, Qe4, 4. RxQ mate).


    But after Qd6 or Qe5, then what? NxQ opens an escape for the K on e5. Moving the N at b2 opens an escape at d3.


    So how about 2. Bb6. Then either 2...Q (any move along diagonal e5-b8, otherwise RxB mate), 3. d7d8(Q) and if 3...QxQ, 4. RxB mate. If 3...Qd5, 4. QxQ mate.

    Does that work?
    I just think we should suspend judgment on Boris until we have all the facts through an inquiry, police investigation, and parliamentary commission...then we should explode him.
    also,
    I'd like to be called Lord Poopy His Most Gloriously Excellent.
  2. #2
    Oh shit. 1...QxBa8. That's a problem.
    I just think we should suspend judgment on Boris until we have all the facts through an inquiry, police investigation, and parliamentary commission...then we should explode him.
    also,
    I'd like to be called Lord Poopy His Most Gloriously Excellent.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Oh shit. 1...QxBa8. That's a problem.
    Ok, here's another try:



    1. Bg2

    then if 1... QxBch, 2. NxB pxR(Q) (only move), 3. RxB ch, Ke5, 4. Nd3 ch (by both Q and N) and mate.


    or if 1... pxR(Q), 2. RxB ch, Qe4, 3. RxQ mate.



    I think that's it?
    Last edited by Poopadoop; 06-16-2023 at 06:30 AM.
    I just think we should suspend judgment on Boris until we have all the facts through an inquiry, police investigation, and parliamentary commission...then we should explode him.
    also,
    I'd like to be called Lord Poopy His Most Gloriously Excellent.
  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Poopadoop View Post
    Ok, here's another try:



    1. Bg2

    then if 1... QxBch, 2. NxB pxR(Q) (only move), 3. RxB ch, Ke5, 4. Nd3 ch (by both Q and N) and mate.


    or if 1... pxR(Q), 2. RxB ch, Qe4, 3. RxQ mate.



    I think that's it?

    Oh wait first line is still a problem because 3... QxR. Edit: Oh no it's not the Q is dead (it's 2 NxQ, not NxB).

    So yeah that might be it after all.
    Last edited by Poopadoop; 06-16-2023 at 06:33 AM.
    I just think we should suspend judgment on Boris until we have all the facts through an inquiry, police investigation, and parliamentary commission...then we should explode him.
    also,
    I'd like to be called Lord Poopy His Most Gloriously Excellent.
  5. #5
    Nope, 1...Qd6, then we're stuck again, can't play RxB.
    I just think we should suspend judgment on Boris until we have all the facts through an inquiry, police investigation, and parliamentary commission...then we should explode him.
    also,
    I'd like to be called Lord Poopy His Most Gloriously Excellent.
  6. #6
    I think we need the white bishop both to mate and to protect c4 in case our Nb2 moves, so I'm starting with 1. Bd5 now.
    I just think we should suspend judgment on Boris until we have all the facts through an inquiry, police investigation, and parliamentary commission...then we should explode him.
    also,
    I'd like to be called Lord Poopy His Most Gloriously Excellent.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •