im pretty amazed at all those saying theyre gonna get their kids cut. lets look at what circumcision actually is...

for all you bleeding heart nancies, circumcising an infant is massively barbaric, and if anybody were to perform a similar or even much minor act upon a child that wasnt erroneously condoned by the retards that call themselves humans they would be put in prison for a long time. this is non-anesthesia surgery performed on newborn boys we're talking about here. if i slap your baby will i go prison for over a decade? no doubt. if you pay a doctor to cut your baby's skin while it screams and wails and you wait in the other room with nothing but hopes and dreams will anybody go to prison?

infant circumcision is wildly immoral, end of story.

but it doesn't end there, it doesnt even begin

the true purpose behind circumcision we may never know, but we can estimate very accurately. its either, but likely a combination of both, due to lack of hygiene in primitive pre-modern societies, and as a mode of curbing sexual exuberance in pre-modern societies.

just because your great-great-great-great-great grandfather was too lazy or too ignorant to pull his foreskin back when he urinated so as to not piss on himself and trap moisture and bacteria sufficient enough to cause disease doesnt mean that that you should be just as lazy or ignorant.

just because our religious semi-origins taught us that sex is evil and we're committing abominations unto our god whenever we permit ourselves to succumb to the will of satan by being more sexually aware than our precious doctrine commands doesn't mean we should too listen to that foolish nonsense.

people nowadays incorrectly equivocate the more nerves of foreskin with cumming faster, and then bunk that since they already cum too quickly. well first, learn how to control your fucking self, and second, increased sexual pleasure in no way means climax is achieved quicker.

do you not find it curious that the purpose of female circumcision is to curb sexual appetite? do you not figure that male circumcision may have a similar purpose? even so it doesnt matter what we rationalize since the empirical evidence is in and it concludes that circumcision reduces penile sexual sensitivity.

not to mention that when the foreskin is intact the PENIS IS BIGGER. and not only bigger but its THICKER and thats what matters the most

will never cease to amaze me how a society that is so abundantly fixated on penis size and sex can so carefree lop off an hugely important part of the penis in both those regards.

after you allow this http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/plastibell.htm to be done to your boy please submit yourself to be hanged, or actually please try to learn from your ignorance and create a better world for your progeny.


sorry for the hostility, im in a hostile mood. i guess being bombarded by illogical and unscientific thought has that affect, and my fuse has been teased repeatedly today


oh and for those of you who say uncut dicks smell worse, well they dont. either the man genetically had a smellier dick than others you know, or he didnt understand genital hygiene that well


cliffnotes for spoon: marklar