|
|
 Originally Posted by Lukie
Originally Posted by Rondavu
Player A has value bet every made hand up to this point. Player A leads out all in deep and covering you on a river that completes a flush after check calling every street. You have top two pair. Do you call?
I think I'm starting to make a point for deductive reasoning that extends beyond hand range.
Couldn't you just say to yourself, "self, Player A has played every made hand agressive. He has played very passive this hand, until he overbets (presumably) the pot when the river brings a scarecard. Self, do we really need the language of deductive reasoning to figure out what this should mean?"
You just used a language of deduction. It was just your own version. If he never plays draws passively, and always value bets the made hand, then should I believe he played this draw passively and went all in when his draw completed?
|
Reply With Quote