|
|
 Originally Posted by Greedo017
my quick opinion on this, given others i'm sure have stronger opinions.
scuba chuck can probably make many worthwhile contributions. he had dissenting opinions and was arrogant.
This is the elitist attitude that is becoming prevelant here. Scuba Chuck decided to face it head on, maybe this is why he was construed as arrogant?
Scuba Chuck whether right or wrong presented opposing views to many common situations. He forced the experts among us to think about and explain their answers, which is something that doesn't always happen. Above all, even if you disagreed with him, Scuba Chuck provoked discussions about poker strategy. I for one liked hearing something other than "fold preflop" and "push the flop".
Originally Posted by Greedo017
everyone has their own personality, but there are lines, he was dancing on the lines, and he was told to back away from the lines.
When a moderator calls him a dick and locks the thread is a line crossed?
Originally Posted by Greedo017
when your attitude becomes a more negative problem than your contributions are positive, its not wrong to say something.
Agreed, but was this done appropriately in this thread?
|
Reply With Quote