|
Hey, I think I found an article that might help influence your decision.. It's from another poker website so I'm not going to link it, Ill just paste it in here.
The Long, Long Run
The long run is hard to define, but, as far as I am concerned, 10 years could be considered a starting point. Simulations can be run, however, no matter what numbers the simulation comes up with, and all things being unequal, the long run will be longer for some people. Playing the lottery is a very bad example of this distribution. Someone has to win; it just never seems to be you. (And what about those folks who win twice?) Tournament poker is the same. Some players run well for years in tournaments and in live action. For others the long run may be farther away. I’ve been around a long time, and I’ve seen many come and go.
The world of poker gives many explanations of why people don't win, while stating that the main reason they do win is luck, especially in tournaments. Players on a bad streak are said to be suffering burn out or playing too much, or one of a dozen other things. The simple truth is that as the Expected Value (EV) catches up, the cards don’t come anymore. Poker tournaments are the arena in which this seems to happen the most quickly. The reason is parity in a field where so many are so closely matched. Not nearly the same as in cash poker.
When a tournament player has been successful over a period of time and suddenly goes under, it is reported that he is retiring or quitting for other reasons. This is bad form and generates bad publicity that ultimately embarrasses the player. The fact is that a time comes when the EV catches up with these players and luck just plain runs out. Many people suffer from delusions of grandeur without challenging the truest barometer in the game, the test of time. This happens to cash players (however they don't need publicity and they don't need to make excuses.) Because of overspending, unrealistic belief in their ability, and downright denial the money runs out, too. Making excuses is a useless endeavor.
If a person is a professional cash player, just moving down ‘in class’ will make the games easier to beat. Regard the rankings as you would the horses on a racing form. You have your handicap horses, your allowance horses, your claiming horses and the cheap claimers. Dropping down a notch or two will certainly help solve a cash player’s winning problems. Dropping into smaller buy-in tournaments will have little if any effect for tournament players.
Many players get used to a lifestyle and live far above realistic means, never stopping to consider they are receiving more than their share of good cards. This is the main reason players turn to cheating. Successful cheating offsets the financial damage that prolonged streaks of bad luck can inflict. (Think of a chart with large deviation points spiking up and down.) So a cheat ends up with a skewed perception of the real game of poker. If you have not lived through one of these streaks you really don't know what playing for a living is all about. I play for a living and, unfortunately, I do know what this is about.
Poker’s media consultants make ridiculous statements about the game and the gullible accept the totally unrealistic drivel dished out to them. They just want to believe in the game of poker. But, the one truth they don't want to believe is the amount of organized cheating that is forever present in the game. Believing this would tarnish their image of management and of many individual players.
So bottom line here is that for many, cheating stems from necessity - remember, gamblers don’t think like normal people. Cheating is necessary if they want to continue playing cards for a living and in maintaining a certain lifestyle and façade. Management profits by, participates in and exploits cheating.
The amount of luck in poker is incredible. The best way to lower the luck factor is by playing short-handed poker, any game. Short-handed Pot Limit poker with small blinds and large stacks is as good a way as any to separate a weaker player from his money. Small blinds allow you to make a large bet on the river without the possibility of being drawn out. It takes tremendous skill to play this game as it demands you use all the weapons in your playing arsenal. The number one goal when playing poker, Limit, Pot Limit or No Limit is to get your money called when you want it called, not an easy feat.
And, as I’ve said before, playing split games gives you better balance and lets you maintain a greater edge. You need them both if you’re going to make it in and through the long run.
Players may run well for years and not even comprehend the reality of it. In the late 70s when cheating was at its peak everywhere all games of any value were cheated. The green light was on in Gardena and Vegas, and anything was allowed. Practically everyone, including regulars who were not involved with cheating, lost substantial amounts. The cheats couldn't rake the money in fast enough, yet some people managed to escape. A few players survived and actually made money. In California’s player dealt games if you had to draw a card (Low-ball and High-ball draw were the games) you couldn't win the pot (at least) 37 1/2% of the time because the card mechanics were at work. Hold-out guys were at work on other hands. Yet some still managed to win. With all this cheating going on do you think good play was the reason for their success? No, it was luck. Good old Lady Luck. Some people were dealt pat wheels (along with pat 6s) everyday, time and again. Just plain LUCK. The very smart ones realized how lucky they were and acted accordingly, investing and buying property. There weren’t very many that smart though.
Bottom line - the amount of luck involved is incredible and lack of it is a great motivator for those who want to maintain the lifestyle. The Long Run is too long for me to imagine in many games. This is the reason most high level professionals cheat. They have faced a long run and don't feel like going through another.
|